5
POPSMore Acorn Voter Fraud Comes to Light 
power-hungry clique that has its own political and personal agendas," she told me. "We are fighting to take back the group." Bertha Lewis, the head of Acorn, told me last year before their ouster that the "Acorn Eight" were "obsessed" and "confused." But Anita MonCrief, an Acorn whistleblower, says the problems run deep. Ms. MonCrief worked at Project Vote, an Acorn affiliate, in late 2007. She says its development director, Karen Gillette, told her she had direct contact with the Obama campaign and also told her to call Obama donors who had maxed out on donations to the candidate but who could contribute to Acorn. Project Vote calls her charges "absolutely false." (Ms. Gillette has declined comment.) Acorn's relationship to the Obama campaign is a matter of public record. Last year, Citizens Consulting Inc., the umbrella group controlling Acorn, was paid $832,000 by the Obama campaign for get-out-the-vote efforts in key primary states. Mr. Obama got his start as a community organ
0
POPSBible Books We offer Bible books, videos, and audio tapes for small groups, seminars, and personal growth. The best source for spiritual development books!
0
POPSRetireWealthyClub.com 1. Diane Agussol projects warmth and fervor through her words. The purpose of her website, RetireWealthy.com, is clearly a genuine one. That purpose is to help others get & continue on the path to success and self-empowerment. Ms. Agussol has dedicated a great deal of time and effort into her cause. This is clearly evident in her very well, put together site. Retire Wealthy.com is east to navigate with it’s simple, professional design. All of the buttons needed to navigate the site are in clear view. All of the site’s information is easy to get to. I love the no fuss look and feel of this site. www.RetireWealthyClub.com www.RetireWealthyClub.com/yourgifts
3
POPSNot everybody's a critic Um. I'm not in agreement with this at all. I think if we pay our money for a book, read it and think about it, we're entitled to comment on it if and where we like. Granted, it may not be given the label 'criticism', but our right to do it can't be disputed surely. What a reader wishes to take away from our commentary/ opinion/ 'criticism' is his or her decision. That's what the arts are all about, surely. Perhaps I've misread this piece, but I just found it arrogant, and I disliked its implication that anyone who hasn't been given the seal of approval by some unknown Literary Overseer has no right to comment on literature in his/ her own personal space.
2
Pops
Newest Clips
Latest Comments
Most Pops
Print
Save
Turn on live update