6
POPSBioHacking: The Plot for the Next Real-life Blockbuster Thriller? Solitary citizens are toiling over test-tubes, sacrificing their time and money to create brand new lifeforms - but this isn't a science fiction movie, it's a hobby. "DIY Biochemistry" sees private citizens converting their dining rooms into DNA labs. It's only a pity that Michael Crichton has passed on, because we've got the plot of his next book right here.
1
POPSTop 20 Science Fiction Films for Technology 11. Star Trek: First Contact (also see its Wiki), Dir. Jonathan Frakes, 1996. 12. The Matrix Trilogy, Dir. The Wachowski Brothers, 1999-2003. 13. Ghost in the Shell & Ghost in the Shell 2: Innocence, Dir. Mamoru Oshii, 1996/2004. Both based on the manga of Masamune Shirow. 14. Alien, Dir. Ridley Scott, 1979. 15. Fantastic Voyage, Dir. Richard Fleischer, 1966. See the novel by the same name by Isaac Asimov. 16. Tron (also see its wiki), Dir. Steven Lisberger, 1982. 17. Logan's Run, Dir. Michael Anderson, 1976. Based on the novel by William F. Nolan and George C. Johnson. 18. Total Recall, Dir. Paul Verhoeven, 1990. Based on a short story by P.K.D.: We Can Remember It for You Wholesale. 19. Minority Report, Dir. Stephen Spielberg, 2002. Based on a short story by P.K.D.: Minority Report. 20. The Fly, Dir. David Cronenberg, 1986.
1
POPSMichael Crichton Passes Away But leaves behind some of the best science based thrillers of our generation. I know I've enjoyed reading quite of few of the books. I have not read State of Fear, yet, but will be purchasing from Amazon today to do just that.
17
POPSMichael Crichton 1942 - 2008 But what a strange career the man had, from Harvard Medical School to the top of the book and movie charts to Hollywood blockbusters to odd best-selling jeremiads against Japanese businessmen and global warming activists. The consistent themes of his work are the consequences of man's own hubris and a thoroughgoing paranoia. Someone is always coming up with a brilliant notion in Crichton, and it always goes hideously kablooey. Bring dinosaurs back to life? Okay, but they'll escape and gobble you up. Organ transplants? Fine until the medical establishment starts harvesting them for profit. Robots? Forget about the robots: they'll shoot you down ("Westworld") or come after you with knives ("Runaway"). Plastic surgery, biotech implants, chasing tornadoes? All terrible, terrible ideas ("Looker," "The Terminal Man," "Twister").
4
POPSNovelist-Screenwriter Michael Crichton, Dies At 66 Crichton would visit that theme again with his triumphant Jurassic Park -- the story of a billionaire entrepreneur who tries to thwart nature and evolution by creating a theme park of genetically engineered dinosaurs. Again, the villain was of our own creation and just doing what nature dictated. In addition to being a prolific novelist, Crichton was an accomplished screenwriter (Extreme Close-Up, Twister) and director (Coma) -- the latter also a scientific cautionary tale by a British MD turned writer, Robin Cooke. He believed that there was a phenomenon he called "consensus science" that invented or exaggerated the existence or effects of such things as global warming and second-hand smoke. No less a believer than Al Gore dismissed Crichton, and presumably his 2004 novel State of Fear, by telling a U.S. House committee: "The planet has a fever. If your baby has a fever, you go to the doctor....
0
POPSER & Jurassic Park creator Michael Crichton dies felt funny hearing about his death since I recently started rereading his book timeline I seem to regulary get interested in someones works at the time of their passing a great writer , I hope he gets acclaim for his genius
4
POPSR.I.P. Michael Crichton, dead at age 66 Other Crichton fiction novels include "The Great Train Robbery," "Congo," "Sphere," "Rising Sun," "The Lost World," and "Airframe." Nonfiction works include "Five Patients," "Jasper Johns," "Electronic Life," and "Travels."
1
POPSThe Seven Sweetest Fictional Theme Parks Pt 2 (#4 - #1) Ah, we saved the best for last.... Yes, if you have not guessed what number one is by now I have this to say: Did you see ANY movies in the early to mid 90s when this one started the new Dinosaur craze? We even had to endure Brendan Fraser as Encino Man due to this one! By now I am sure you know Michael Crichton's Magnum Opus is number one. and no, it is NOT Congo! Enjoy!
1
POPS"Super Cells"! Single Celled Organisms that can Make Oil, Cure Cancer, and Build a City Amazing science. We might think Bacteria's mightiest power is confining us to the bathroom after an ill-advised late night snack, but having only one cell to deal with means bacteria can adapt incredibly well - and a single mutation can give rise to powers that make Professor Xavier's wheelchair-accessible mansion look like a home for people who are good at minigolf. Here we look at five organisms that would be called the Super-Cells, if that name wasn't probably already taken by Michael Crichton.
11
POPSTechnothrillers vs. Science Fiction "I'm not sure this explains the sales figures-- after all, people don't generally know the details of the ending before they buy a book-- but I thought it was an interesting remark, and pretty accurate given my limited reading of thrillers."
0
POPSDownload ER Episodes For Free ER is created by novelist Michael Crichton and is based on his own experiences as a medical student. It throws light on the professional difficulties of doctors and represents an urban life style. Series also portrays medical students and their quest to become successful doctors. ER’s each episode is unique and every episode gives a hint about the story of another day. ER is one of the best rated TV series and has won 22 Emmy awards, 115 Emmy nominations, George Foster Peabody Award and also Screen Actors Guild Awards for Outstanding Ensemble Performance in a Drama Series. ER is the most expensive dramatic series in TV history with its 13-million-dollar-per-episode average budget during the 1998-1999 season.
5
POPSScientific consensus One must ask, "How in the world did university researchers come to conclusions that defended this outrageous affront to society?" A look back at the research concluded that the researchers adjusted their outcomes to support the theory of those paying for the research.