14
POPSCIA Official: Cheney Likely Ordered Forged Letter to Saddam This was intended to link Iraq to 9/11. This vindicates my statement about the White House denial and that it was likely Cheney who considers himself "not a part of the Executive branch", but it was drafted on White House letterhead. We now have DOCUMENTED PROOF of a conspiracy to lie and fabricate evidence for war with Iraq! --all likely headed by Dick Cheney, chief of the neoconservative Fifth Column that hijacked the government by using 9/11 as their pretext for everything. For Cheney to use White House letterhead to order a forged letter from the CIA is also a blatant usurpation of power , making use of power that is not his ("not part of Executive branch"). Did Bush know or did Cheney act alone?
4
POPSDo US Internment Camps Really Exist? The really big question is which one of us reading this will be interned in one of these camps? Considering the size and scope of the ones we know about, compared with the already 1 in 100 prison population we currently have, you have to imagine that the near future will see a much higher ratio. Can you imagine 1 in every 50 citizens in a camp or prison? Hell, even 1 in 75 would be astounding. With a ratio that high you can be assured you are someone you know will be classified an "Enemy Combatant." Also, since REX 84 handed us over to NORTHCOM, we no longer have any sovereignty any way. It's all very frightening when you start questioning the reasons behind this sort of wholesale US sell out.
7
POPSFunny how they never attack the science... It seems very popular in the media these days to attack 911 Truthers as crazy or lunatic... A lot of different right wing voices have "coincidentally" started chirping on the topic. But no one does much to contradict the science behind the doubt; or the obvious inconsistentcies -- especially surrounding the "plane" crash at the Pentagon. I think the people who caused 911 are worried that the truth is catching up with them. Go to YouTube and watch "Loose Change" to get caught up on the science and doubt around 911.
0
POPS9-11 cover up denial propaganda? Lately in the midst of puff-peice internet articles, I have been finding sentences here and there that seem to actively campaign against the 911 Inside Job conspiracy theory. Seeded in these light reading articles are sentences like the one I've clipped; they are striking because they are clumbsily included among the fluff, feeling almost like a non-sequitur, or out of context. There are lots of unanswered questions regarding the circumstances and events of 9-11, but it seems like there is some kind of shadow campain to make doubting the official story of 9-11 an absurdity in itself. If you find more of these, please clip them with the title "9-11 cover up denial propaganda".
8
POPSSome strategies of denialists Examples of common topics in which denialists employ their tactics include: Creationism/Intelligent Design, Global Warming denialism, Holocaust denial, HIV/AIDS denialism, 9/11 conspiracies, Tobacco Carcinogenecity denialism (the first organized corporate campaign), anti-vaccination/mercury autism denialism and anti-animal testing/animal rights extremist denialism. Denialism spans the ideological spectrum, and is about tactics rather than politics or partisanship.
5
POPSWhat Is Denialism? 5 general tactics are used by denialists to sow confusion. They are conspiracy, selectivity (cherry-picking), fake experts, impossible expectations (also known as moving goalposts), and general fallacies of logic.
6
POPS911 Conspiracy Archives Here is comprehensive list of all the articles delving into this conspiracy theory concerning 911. Whether you believe it or not, these articles are a MUST READ for all Americans. At the very least, we should demand another totally non-partisan investigation into 911 by a panel has the authority to call witnesses before a grand jury.
0
POPSStudy: Holocaust Denial VERY small movement No more than 20 "professional" Holocaust deniers, supported by several thousand funders. Does anyone take this movement seriously, other than cranks? Is it worth compromising freedom of expression to suppress such a marginal viewpoint?