There are some paradoxical notions that float around about networks and community. One of those notions is the more diverse your network the better. The other is is having a tight network of close associates is
better. The problem comes from thinking too superficially about networks and community building.
A closed network like the one on the left is filled with people who know one another well, who think alike, who share similar values, aims, ambitions and approaches.
An open, diverse network serves a different function. It provides access to information and influence that your close group of buddies cannot provide. It would be nice if it is just so simple to have both. This is more difficult that it may seem. The solution is not making a choice between open or closed networks, but rather how you function within both.
clipped from edbrenegar.typepad.com
