3
POPSHow The Earth Was Made~History Chnl. Any global warming freaks getting this? This 2 hr. Special on the History Channel forgets (oops) that politics are supposed to have taken over. Being that we are in the gulf between iceages and our climate has been highly unusually stable and moderate, I just wish the globalist /one-world propaganda agenda of manmade globalwarming ~ would kindly just SHOVE IT!
2
POPSIPCC Changed.GW Data say Scientists Panel who wrote statement distorted data drastically. Scientists are complaining and protesting. THEY are the ones who have the knowledge and did the study. I would think we would listen to them rather than a failed politician and some U.N.policy makers. Don't you imagine there is some other agenda? Why else would its faithful get behind it so blindly other than because it seems to go against those they hate politically. For this childish game, people invest themselves in this long, drawn out, and complicated fantastic creation. I've got to hand it to whoever drew up these plans. What a monster play-write!
2
POPSTaxing Babies for Projected Consumption As this potential alternate agenda today is swirling up amidst the global warming hustle I think others will also soon rise to the surface and among them we may see the true and real agendas behind this facade; this willy-nilly "manmade global warming" which is made of more hot air than any of these exaggerated, highly contested projections they think wew are dumb enough to buy into. There are some, I believe, who will be saying it is this one right here that has been let slip out of the bag and is one of the truer intentions of the puppeteers pulling Al Gore's and the U.N.'s strings. Global population reduction ~ even elimination ~ on a mass scale. I'm not in line with that myself but I'll bet you hear Alex Jones claiming just that this very night on his radio show.
4
POPSLeft creates the West Islamists Hate. (To understand, must read the article.) -< "Nor do I mean something reserved for the well to do, affluent or wealthy. No. I’m talking about a something that endures and remains the same throughout the ages and not limited to a social group or type of person. Anyone can have class – even a society. Someone with class has a certain elegance of style, taste, and manner, one that is altruistic, noble, selfless - even courageous. The liberal Left under the banners of free speech and political correctness has done a pretty good job of driving class from our society. And it has done another thing. It fuels the Islamist’s agenda and shows to the vast majority of everyday Muslims that western civilization is decadent and a threat to their values and beliefs." >-
0
POPSObama not tough enough How do they go for her jugular without being called out as a bully. She wants to be, she says, treated like the men. But if she is roughed up IN THE SLIGHTEST - she will play the gender card, the "ganging up" card, and people will buy it. If Dems pick her, we will have nothing different than Rudy. Or the agenda that Bush has been sheparding. Maybe they can find a whole new Dem. candidate.
3
POPSLA Times Swallows for TNR Are you kidding me? "It's also not at all clear to any fair-minded reader what the telephone transcripts actually show" WHAT? After hearing their continued defense of this guy, then reading the phone transcript tells me that the TNR guys were trying to hold on to this military-bashing with every last shred of fingernail and dignity. What a load of crap from this LAT guy. Every reference to blogs and mags that tried to get at the underlying B.S. are derogatory. AND WHAT'S MORE~they still haven't retracted it. It still, after all this, sits out there like a festering, fetid load long devoid of any telltale steam. ;-)
1
POPSM.B. ~ The Project --<< " Western politicians mistakenly believe that negotiation with Islamists is possible, as if these do not have an intransigent agenda, designed to infiltrate or weaken the West. Islamists have failed to influence so-called most "Muslim countries" to accept their ideology, yet the West accepts Islamists' "advice" at its own peril." >>--
1
POPSGlaciersGrowing,OceansLowering --<< " Mont Blanc Glacier Almost Doubles in Size in Four Years 15 Oct 07 - That’s what the headline should have said. Instead, it shouted "Global warming makes Mont Blanc grow," in what I consider a blatant attempt to hide the truth. See Mont Blanc Glacier Almost Doubles in Size" >>--
4
POPSWhatMean"WE"Harry? R U Kidding Me? Watch for full effect at Breitbart.com http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=6938 The guy is just too much. Now he's been in on it from the start, or this was the plan all along, or some damn thing.
2
POPSA Citizen First, A Journalist Second --<< "The first is when a member of the press witnesses a crime. The media may not like this, and the politicians and public officials who leak to them surely don’t like it, but unauthorized disclosures of information in government files is a crime." >>--
3
POPSAmericanAcademics Misrepresented. In an attempt to misrepresent, and basically LIE, dmegivern tried to post this: http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/0D13C9F9-FFB9-4238-BD46-518A7C802977/ "American Academics", implying that one group far outnumbering another in "American Academe" as it was put, must be the result of that first group attending, graduating,being part of, etc as opposed to the other,due to the supposition that they are the sophisticated, correct ones. And it would follow, presumably, that this is the reason why colleges are dominated by liberals, because simply put,anybody else isn't smart enough. Well, the article beyond a couple sentences, was available for $40 and would have made quite a different impression. One the professor would have had a different response to, I venture. (Besides, even taking your interpretation, misleading as it is, the intro referred to "centrists". Not "liberals".
6
POPSSanchez: MAss Media is Unethical --<<MY ASSESSMENT IS THAT YOUR PROFESSION, TO SOME EXTENT, HAS STRAYED FROM THESE ETHICAL STANDARDS AND ALLOWED EXTERNAL AGENDAS TO MANIPULATE WHAT THE AMERICAN PUBLIC SEES ON TV, WHAT THEY READ IN OUR NEWSPAPERS AND WHAT THEY SEE ON THE WEB. FOR SOME OF YOU, JUST LIKE SOME OF OUR POLITICIANS, THE TRUTH IS OF LITTLE TO NO VALUE IF IT DOES NOT FIT YOUR OWN PRECONCEIVED NOTIONS, BIASES AND AGENDAS.>>--
3
POPSACLU=Front? 1961 HouseHearings
1. The ACLU, long an advocate of unlimited freedom of the press and freedom of speech, asked Secretary of Defense Charles Wilson to withdraw a pamphlet entitled "How to Spot a Communist," prepared by the 1st Army and used by the Watertown, Mass., arsenal (New York Times, June 12, 1955) 2. The ACLU protested the publishing by the League of Decency of a list of movies and books that the league considered immoral. (Reference: Daily Worker, Mar. 22, 1957). (It has long been known that one of the primary aims of the Communist Party is to subvert the morals of the American public.) 3. The ACLU, when queried by Columnist Lawrence Fertig as to why "They did not defend the most basic of all civil liberties--the right of a man to earn his living without paying tribute to any other individual or private organization" (right to work laws in various States), replied, "there are no civil liberties grounds on which such statutes should be supported>>---- -------------- -- Site has many more examp
4
POPSWORKERS PARTY PLATFORM Site explores = SIMILARITIES BETWEEN FDR'S "NEW DEAL" AND MUSSOLINI'S FASCISM (CORPORATE SOCIALISM) = NIXON'S "GREAT SOCIALIST REVIVAL" = BUSH: "... a Republican administration will continue and complete the work of a Democratic (Clinton) administration."
3
POPSHave we Adopted CMNST. MANIFESTO?-3 --<<In order to comprehend, more fully, just how far down the Socialist road (under both Democrat and Republican presidents) we have traveled, consider the following from the Ten Point plank of the Communist (Socialist) Manifesto of 1848: = Abolition of property in land and application of all rent of land to public purposes. = A heavy progressive or graduated income tax = Centralization of credit ... by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly = Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the state. = Free education for all children in public schools >>>------------ --------- The thing that gets me now is how the swing is back to the drive for control of the radio airwaves. Funny how its based on vengeance rather than their own principle.
4
POPSWHAT IS SOCIALISM? (Collectivism)-1 --<<Bernard Baruch, Wall Street financier and key advisor in Frankliln Delano Roosevelt's New Deal and chairman of the War Industries Board during the First World War, stated the following in an August 1918 speech: "Every man's life is at the call of the nation and so must be every man's property. We are living today in a highly organized state of socialism. The state is all; the individual is of importance only as he contributes to the welfare of the state". ( The New American magazine,"The One Party State", Oct. 4, 2004)
0
POPSRE-defining Conflict Monitoring First,they had participants complete a political questionnaire, which included a question about whom, if anyone, they voted for in the 2004 presidential election, along with a scale ranging from -5 ("extremely liberal") to 5 ("extremely conservative"). Next they had participants complete a Go/No-Go task. In their version, participants were shown an M or a W, and told to respond only to one or the other by pressing a key (half the participants responded to M's, and half to W's). Responding to the target letter is the Go part, and not responding to the other letter is the No-Go part. In order to make responding the default, 80% of the 500 trials each participant saw were Go trials. This makes is so that when a No-Go trial pops up, participants face potential crosstalk interference.
0
POPSAmodio Study - Part 4/4 --<<But the original definition of CM, written six years ago by the researchers who hypothesized it, didn't presume that the habitual response was wrong, inappropriate, or objectively mismatched with current requirements. It presumed only that a stimulus had challenged the habit. According to the original definition, CM is "a system that monitors for the occurrence of conflicts in information processing." It "evaluates current levels of conflict, then passes this information on to centers responsible for control, triggering them to adjust the strength of their influence on processing." In experiments such as Amodio's, the habit is objectively wrong: You tapped the button, and the researcher knows that what you saw was a W. But real life is seldom that simple. Maybe what you saw—what you think you saw—will turn out to require a different response from the one that has hitherto served you well. Maybe it won't.
0
POPSAmodio Study - Part 3/4 --<<"A study that invited such complications would be more interesting—examining, for instance, whether conservatives, having resisted doubts about the wisdom of the status quo, are more likely than liberals to doubt the wisdom of change".>>--
0
POPSAmodio Study - Part 2/4 Habitual way of thinking. Informational complexity. Need to change. Those are sweeping terms. They imply that conservatives, on average, are adaptively weaker at thinking, not just button-pushing. And that implication has permeated the press. The Los Angeles Times told readers that the study "suggests that liberals are more adaptable than conservatives" and "might be better judges of the facts." Agence France Presse reported that conservatives in the study "were less flexible, refusing to deviate from old habits 'despite signals that this ... should be changed.' " The Guardian asserted, "Scientists have found that the brains of people calling themselves liberals are more able to handle conflicting and unexpected information."
3
POPS " . . . . . . . . , Just Not The Mission ! What is going on now is not war, but reconstruction. Or more precisely, providing military security for Iraq's social, political and economic reconstruction. The war was clearly over at "Mission Accomplished", and we quickly pulled our major hardware presence from the arena. Why are we even discussing the "war in Iraq"?And why aren't conservatives pounding liberals for wanting to "walk out on the security necessary for Iraqi reconstruction"? Because too many of us have accepted liberal control of the language.
Newest Clips
see Newest Clips
1
Latest Pops
Latest Comments
Most Pops
Tags
Print
Save
Turn on live update