3
POPSBush's Final Report Card: Biggest Spender Since LBJ Fair and balanced analysis from Cato Institute. Republicans need to confess this if they expect to have any credibility in criticizing Obama's liberal spending. The American people are sick of bi-partisan lying and hypocritical finger-pointing Obama's first report card, where all spending is under his watch, will not be available until next year, 2010 (which should be a doozy too). President George W. Bush’s last year was fiscal 2009. Outlays that year were $3.522 trillion, according to the CBO. However, $108 billion was spending for the 2009 economic stimulus package passed under President Obama. Bush was thus roughly responsible for $3.414 trillion of spending in 2009, which includes outlays for the financial bailouts enacted under his watch.
1
POPSObama's Buggery Czar, A Radical Homosexual Agenda Solid journalism and news, and not from the religious right. This is cause for legitimate fear , for parents especially, that cannot be brushed off as a "phobic" disorder. A reprobate is in charge of "safe schools"! Jennings is not qualified, and should be immediately removed. This editorial requires public attention, and immediate call for action. Contributing to the delinquency of minors is a crime in every state, and to condone it from within the Obama administration is scandalous. Where are the "ethics" committees? This is an outrage, and reflects directly upon the President's judgment! Pedophilia is a crime!
3
POPSBarack W. Bush--Obama's "Preventive War" in Afghanistan, Neocons Applaud Obushma's Afghanistan war policy--the BUSH DOCTRINE CONTINUES. The word "terrorism" was hardly invoked, but "essential for our national interests....and attacks on our HOMELAND" implied the same thing. It's still all about the 9/11, and only the rhetoric has changed slightly. But this war is not about "national interests", but International (Globalist) interests. Obama is a Puppet for the globalist agenda as much as Bush was to the neoconservative agenda for "global hegemony". See Rachel Maddow's MSNBC video analysis about Obama's Nobel Peace Prize and proof that the Bush Doctrine continues. Powerful analysis. The real purpose of Af-Pak war policy is here .
0
POPSObama's Decision on Afghanistan: Surge! OBushma policy: No 'change' here in this "war of necessity", per Obama. (Never blindly trust a government that uses this phrase, as if to shut down all opposition and end all questioning). This "war of necessity" is merely the parroting the same fear-mongering, unproven, baseless propaganda the GOP is claiming here too: President Barack Obama: "This is not a war of choice. This is a war of necessity. Those who attacked America on 9/11 are plotting to do so again. right...we heard the same fear-mongering from Bush. I thought this was all going to "change" (not really).
1
POPSObama Lied to Win Election on "Defending Our Liberties" These were Obama's words of hope and "change" before election to office....but today you will not hear him say this. While justly railing against Bush, Obama has done the same in regard to warrantless surveillance (see Cato article). The Constitution and Bill of Rights, our liberties, are still being trampled. This is proof he broke his promise and is no savior of American liberties. Need more? Look at how much like Bush and Cheney he is here from WSJ: Obama Channels Cheney Obama adopts Bush view on the powers of the presidency.
1
POPSDon't Portray Obama or Global Governance in a 'Negative Light' Obama's media liaison meets with Fox News (Satire) . Pardon, it just fits so well. Proof of appropriateness of this from this article here in Dec. 2008 It's a record-setting press honeymoon. President-elect Barack Obama has received the most positive campaign news coverage on the main network news shows in the 20-year history of such studies by the Center for Media and Public Affairs (CMPA). Wonder when the media, other than Fox, will end the love fest and start reporting people's fears and concerns about the Agenda , and without similar V tactics from the White House .
1
POPSDanger--America Becoming Statist: First Bush, Now Obama Note: First the Security or Police State then the Nanny State. This is a must-read article, and hopefully an eye-opener to those still stuck in the "left" or "right" paradigm of thinking of partisan politics, both of which pick and chose which parts of the Constitution they want to dismantle for desired ends. Put the Bush and Obama policies together, sprinkle in a couple more terrorist attacks, and one or two more state-caused financial calamities, and you have a recipe for . . . * The destruction of American liberty * The blossoming of a Leviathan State
2
POPSThe Neoconservative Resurgency With Obama--Neoconservativism 2.0 Well documented article worth reading entirely. Then there is this article too : That must be the meaning of change. The goal was not to restore the rule of law and constitutional legitimacy, but to transcend the Bush administration's cowboy unilateralism and tactfully reassert a neo-conservative normalcy in America's foreign policy. And this more recent article: ‘No change from Bush to Obama', say Neocons and Liberals 16 Sep 2009 American foreign policy under Barack Obama has not changed course after the Bush years, according to a group of prominent commentators from both sides of the political divide. (except for the breaking missile shield policy)...from a UK media source. Yet the U.S. Media are absolutely silent.
0
POPSWhat Obama Did NOT Tell Children in Public Schools Satire, yet so true, in that Obama went thru the private school route, like so many of the elite in Washington who tout "public education" and "stay in school"--for everybody else that is. It is also very presumptuous for any president to think that a) the schools belong to the federal government (they are state and county run), and b) that the President can by-pass parents and speak directly to their children, for whom they are solely responsible. Only communist governments think the children belong to them, thus a clear mark of the Collectivist State Parent is manifest . This is Marxism 101.
2
POPSMexican Standoff: Obama Pressed to Renounce North American Union Nor is this coalition giving Bush a pass in this non-partisan issue: "The members and supporters of The American Cause hereby call on President Obama to renounce at the North American Leaders Summit in Guadalajara the failed and destructive Bush policy of moving the United States, Mexico and Canada towards any sort of union or integration.
0
POPSAfghanistan, Obama's War; US and Russia Allies This Time Irony: Russia is helping the US in this war while the original purpose of Al Qaeda (the database), trained by the CIA, was to fight Russian insurgency into Afghanistan. Remember that? Now Russia is helping the U.S. do what they originally attempted, but failed (due to the Taliban's resolve). So the U.S. has now played both sides of the fence against each other. At least Russia is consistent! (Video at source).
1
POPSObama's Afghan War Sets US Troop Death Record But Americans yawn and approve. Why so complacent? What are "we" really fighting for there, in a foreign country that never attacked us? So that Afghan women can go to school and boys and girls can fly kites (the Bush era propaganda)? Why does Obama get a pass, but Bush did not? "Stabilization" was only necessary because of the US-led insurgency to topple the previous government, which had no connection (no hard evidence, just propaganda) to 9/11 either! Where are all the protesters against Bush's war, that Obama continues, and even has "surged" to expand?
8
POPSRachel Maddow Unmasks Obama, Legalizing Tyrannical Powers Even the left's Maddow sees past his stagecraft with excellent analysis provided, including a Film clip from Minority Report (Tom Cruise film)--a perfect illustration. How come so many others are still blind? The history of tyranny is one of its subtlety in coming under other pretenses and "necessary" measures. Obama is NOT "Mr. Constitution" but proposes a tyrannical new power which he is "developing a new legal framework for" PREVENTIVE DETENTION (contrary to the Constitution) . This will effect American lives, but is being constructed around "terrorism" in the context of strictly foreigners to sell it. Worth watching, though dated, very important. The principle is precisely the same as Bush's PREVENTIVE WAR , where America attacks on the basis of pure suspicion (read propaganda and lies), before any hostile actions are done.
3
POPSObama's Supreme Court Nominee on 2nd Amendment This is her view of the Constitution in part, particularly the 2nd amendment. Obama stated that her views on the Constitution were consistent with his own. Now his view is clear too then. The ten amendments in the Bill of Rights that defend our liberties are all connected, and rise or fall together.
1
POPSObama's Mexican Host Dies of "Flu Like Symptoms" "...died the next day from flu like symptoms". How they are dismissing this as "pneumonia" is interesting since pneumonia does not kill that rapidly and ordinarily would prevent even an official meeting. The man would have been hospitalized. Also swine flu reports have mentioned "pneumonia like illness" as well. Was he the first, just after seeing Obama?
0
POPSObama Pushing U.S. Citizen as Afghan President Obama's soft "insurgency" and interference into Afghanistan. Contrary to the words of Obama, "establishing democracy" and a Puppet Government is precisely what the US is trying to do in Afghanistan. Obama again unmasked. Now get this: His candidacy is seen as a direct violation of the Chapter Three, Article Sixty Two of Afghanistan's Constitution, which states that only an Afghan citizen has the right to run for president - which means that Jalali would have to apply for Afghan citizenship first.
2
POPSObama vs. Netanyahu, Pre-meeting Manuevers Obama may not bow openly to Netanyahu (as he did the Saudi King), but Israel will continue to get heavy military support from the U.S., and in turn carry out their atrocities, even more so under the neocon-linked Likud party PM Netanyahu (who said "9/11 was good for Israel"): ...intends to continue the military assistance agreement that was signed by his predecessor, George W. Bush. Israel demands the entire world revolve around it's own self interests, which is the cause of the present continued war policy.
4
POPSObama Adopts Bush Policy on Domestic Spying This is a landmark moment. No 'change' here either. Was this not a major issue before, American freedoms and civil liberties from government instrusion? Will Democrats remain silent? Is a mere change of party--but not policy--enough?
3
POPSObama's Blackwater--Triple Canopy just a "change" of contractor, former Chicago-based company with operations out of Israel. Democracy Now has an article and podcast here on this issue.
1
POPSObama's Af-Pak Policy, Expanding the War on Terrorism Historically democrats have always waged the world wars (i.e. Wilson, FDR) under the pretense to "make the world safe for democracy". With all the rationale and logic of hunting mosquito's with howitzers the fraudulent "war on terrorism" is being expanded , increased, both in arms and foreign aid for Pakistan (more billions). The mistake of Democrats was in limiting their criticism of unjust war only to Iraq, while Af-Pak wars also have false justifications. (Neither the Taliban nor bin Laden were involved in 9/11, and said so on BBC and Karachi Pakistan newspapers). Yet hardly a cry from the liberals and democrats? How party-loyalty makes one blind.
1
POPSObama's "Mandatory Service" Youth Legislation Passes Senate Part of the "civilian national security force" agenda passed the Senate and additional legislation is on the way. This was attempted earlier in history through the Boy and Girl Scouts, but not through the government directly, to indoctrinate and teach absolute loyalty to the State, nationalism. The one from Obama would be more loyal to a particular agenda, a socialist agenda. This is government manipulation of youth under color of "patriotism".
5
POPS"Another 9/11" Being Used to Drive/Justify Obama Policy Propaganda tactics, like "WMD claims" about Iraq, are being used to drive or justify (already preset) military agenda for a Pakistan war front. This is precisely like the same "fixing the intelligence around the policy" used for Iraq --alarmist, "apocalyptic intelligence", to justify what Obama "must do" as a CFR puppet for continuing a "war on terrorism" for global democracy. 9/11 continues to be the justification for "changing everything" and continue wars for "regime change" and more "preventive wars". Are small groups in Pakistan really a threat to Western Civilization? No one could rationally believe this paranoid propaganda. America was less afraid of the Soviet Union than this, and not one shot was fired to stop the Cold War. This is also why another "bin Laden tape" was released this last week. The American people are being prepared for more wars.
2
POPSObama to Adopt Neocon's "Multiple War" Policy Blueprint
The first clips reveal Obama's new policy, to which Robert Gates gives evidence, and the American Enterprise Institute (arm of the Israeli Lobby) confidently announces (as if they run the Obama administration). This was the exact blueprint of the neonconservative think tank, Project for a New American Century --who ran the Bush administration's foreign policy from within--and is proven by their own infamous document (clip 3) called Rebuilding America's Defenses, which the policy parrots: LARGE WARS...the United States must retain sufficient forces able to rapidly deploy and win multiple simultaneous large-scale wars and also to be able to respond to unanticipated contingencies in regions where it does not maintain forward-based forces. This resembles the “two-war” standard that has been the basis of U.S. force planning over the past decade. Yet this standard needs to be updated to account for new realities and potential new conflicts
1
POPSStop the Afghanistan Surge and Quagmire Afghanistan will be Obama's Iraq...unless, you demand "Change" and take action to your Congressmen here in this system from a good organization called Just Foreign Policy . This campaign as bi-partisan support with even two republicans, Walter Jones and Ron Paul endorsing it. Do not believe the Big Lie, continued by Obama that war and occupation of Afghanistan will "make America safe from terrorism", when the Taliban never attacked America, and this war only contributes to their increasing support against the US (coalition) Occupier. THIS IS A CONTINUANCE OF LIES OF A "WAR ON TERRORISM" CONSISTENT WITH THE SAME NEOCON/ISRAELI AGENDA FOR A NEW MIDDLE EAST for Global Democracy.
2
POPSWill Obama Support Inquiry into Unconstitutional Bush Policies? ...or not? The Bush Memos are creating pressure. Answer: No, he will find a way not to or a distraction to avoid it (like war). Obama is covering for Bush instead of "defending the Constitution of the United States", as he swore (as did the Usurper, Bush, too). These CFR members and elite cover for each other (its in their secret oaths), just like Pelosi (also CFR) said "impeachment is off the table" as soon as Democrats had a majority (power) in Congress and could. The only way Obama would "support" this important Constitutional investigation is if he established an "independent commission" much like the phony 911 Commission to cover it all up, or bury it in legal mumbo jumbo. Time to remove the partisan blindfolds. If Obama does not support this then he is obstructing justice and aiding and abetting Bush's abuse of Executive power, and would also therefore be just as untrustworthy.
4
POPSRussian Scholar: Obama Will Declare Martial Law, US to Breakup ...by 2010. Wild as this sounds Obama declaring Martial Law (using Bush's Executive Orders which he did not rescind) is a possibility. If gas prices go back to $5 per gallon (as some are saying by summer) this would provoke an outrage by Americans who would hold the federal government, banks, Wall Street, and oil companies responsible for all of their economic woes, in revolutionary fashion , which they are being forced to pay for in record federal spending. Obama would then bring down the Iron Fist system established by Bush since 9/11 called Homeland Security (and actually intended to control the American people, not terrorists). Why do you think the government has been rehearsing scenarios of "civil unrest"?
3
POPSMcCain Goes Ballistic, Calls Out Obama on Appropriations Bill McCain in just indignation takes Obama to the mat on this massive spending bill, as well as the guilt of other republicans. Enough! Good honest anger at a corrupt bill the American people might be hung with. McCain (finally) expresses here the sentiment of millions of unrepresented Americans who have plenty of "taxation without (real) representation" in Washington DC. This is not politics, if you listen, his voice modulates with candor... he recites Obama's pledges against pork spending, time and place during campaign , does not spare Rahm Emanuel either, nor his own party. His final words: "So much for 'Change'"! Listen to his remarks in Congress at the mp3 link.
7
POPSSen. Byrd Troubled, Warns Obama about Abuse of Power Sen Byrd (D), who raised issues about power with the Bush administration, is very evidently troubled about the abuse of power by the Obama administration. Byrd is the senior Senator and third in line of succession, therefore worthy of this counsel. If Obama does not heed him, of the same party, it will speak volumes. There is apparent reference to Obama's Justice Dept. which raised the issue of Executive Privilege itself to thwart investigation of the Bush administration in court. (See my Clipmark Obama Administration is Covering for Bush Administration ). Not a good sign, and all too familiar, which smacks of rule by Secrecy. Is there anything more anti-American, in the Constitution, than appointing "Czars"--unaccountable heads of agencies to do whatever they please? The term "Czar" has become all too familiar (Energy Czar, Drug Czar, etc) and accepted, always under the plea of "necessity".
1
POPSObama's Afghan/Paki Surge, Civilians Will Suffer Most But the politically-correct premise of the entire war there is left unchallenged by the Democrats, and of course Republicans, except for a few lone voices. The heaviest consequences will fall on the civilian population , who will be increasingly opposed in turn against the US-led foreign invading forces increasing resistance who are the real "insurgents" involved in a domestic dispute that is of a very long history. Apparently the 1 million deaths of Iraqi civilians is not enough blood for the bipartisan war-mongers who have bought the neoconservative line of wars for "regime change" , nor the hidden death count of Afghans and Pakis thus far (with women and children). Do Americans really believe that the Taliban is a real or imminent threat to the U.S.? (And no, they publicly admitted on BBC, as well as Bin Laden in Karachi newspaper, that they had no knowledge or involvement in Sept. 11th).
6
POPSObama Administration Shielding Bush Administration This is "aiding and abetting" and "obstruction of justice", and does not represent change even promised during the campaign. Mark it well. (Remember also that Obama changed his position and supported new domestic spying legislation). Those in the CFR and secret society elite brotherhoods shield each other from prosecution and are therefore "assessories" to each others' crimes against the Constitution, and their oaths of office. Obama is covering for Bush.
1
POPSObama Approves & Continues Paki Drone Strikes So much for Pakistan's sovereignty and civilians being killed in the war on terrorism. These are unilateral US strikes by UAVs. Was Pakistan notified or asked first? Would the US permit another country to strike on our soil? How would the US respond? Were they about to attack the U.S.? No. The real reason for all this is to erase/kill all the CIA-created Al Qaeda operatives who know too much, including family and friends. Don't miss this from the second article: At his daily White House briefing, press secretary Robert Gibbs declined to answer questions about the strikes, saying, ‘I’m not going to get into these matters.’ Remotely piloted Predator drones operated by the Central Intelligence Agency have carried out 28 missile attacks in Fata since last summer, killing At least 132 people. The NYT, quoting Pakistani officials, reported that as many as 100 of them were civilians.[/b
4
POPSObama Challenged to Downsize "War on Terror" America has been under a perpetual "yellow alert", without any evidence whatsoever, even during the Inauguration. This propaganda campaign and ruse, domestically, has been real expensive, and as long as there is a war in Iraq and Afghanistan and strikes in Pakistan (which Obama continues) merely renaming it will make little difference. Clinton carried out wars abroad without having a major campaign title. US covert military actions have actually retained an almost constant state of "war" without Congressional declarations. The domestic costs of the 'war on terrorism' have distracted state and local police from the very great and real threat of "normal" crimes which have been overlooked while the "terrorism" threat has been grossly Overblown and law enforcement inefficiently deployed and side-tracked with nonsense training and equipment, and increased federal debt
0
POPSBush's Final Act, Legal Defense of Domestic Spying This shows what the Bush admin. is afraid of most, thereby demonstrating that the constitutionality of domestic, warrantless spying does not have firm legal support but was/is probably illegal (unless the 4th amendment has been stricken from the Bill of Rights). Americans, however, should have the same concern about Obama who shows no signs of "change" on domestic spying either: Eric Holder, the incoming U.S. attorney, said the Obama administration supported the spy legislation and would defend it Americans will have no freedom unless the Constitution and our rights are pressed against both the Executive and Congress.
3
POPSKissinger to Obama: Opportunity for New World Order Speaking of the Israel/Gaza "crisis", he says that Obama's task should be to "develop an overall strategy for America", and that "a new world order can be created... it's a great opportunity"! This demonstrates that the "war on terrorism" is really all about this global scheme, the same "new world order" that George H. W. Bush first mentioned publicly in a speech coincidentally on Sept. 11, 1990 (precisely 11 years to the day before 9/11) , Clinton, George W. Bush, Tony Blair, and many others have talked about publicly. It is their dominant theme. Note Kissinger says Israel is "the most important" issue, but refers to other potential tensions, and "jihadists". So both republican and democrat Presidents, now including Obama, are moving toward the same new world order , which the neoconservatives had termed "benevolent global hegemony" led by the U.S.. Kissinger is a CFR member, like Obama
4
POPSMedia Censors as U.S. Rabbis Push for Peace in Gaza Note how the MSM media silences these Jews and only publishes the militant or radical Zionist views that defend Israeli aggression with US support. This has been going on along time, until now. Unfortunately, the media, except for Democracy Now! and Pacifica and a few other places, are obliterating the message that many, many American Jews and other religious leaders, spiritual leaders and just American citizens are outraged at the immorality of what is happening.
Newest Clips
see Newest Clips
Pops
Comments
Tags
2
Most Pops
Print
Save
Turn on live update