5
POPSRepublicans Need to Dump the Neoconservatives The republicans need a "tea party" within their own camp! The Bush and present GOP "conservatives" are pushing big government Statism as much as Democrats, with only a different slant. Wars for democracy are a key element of both parties now. There is an insidious philosophy underlying this acceptance of the "natural" growth of statism. Neoconservative columnist David Brooks wrote ... we need "a vigorous One Nation Conservatism ... by making the nation great, individuals are able to join their narrow concerns to a larger national project." Actually, it was originally the Democrats that used to believe in curtailing the powers of the Federal government. (This was after the Civil War where they were called Dixie-crats). See this related Clipmark: Danger--America Becoming Statist, First Bush Now Obama
1
POPSDanger--America Becoming Statist: First Bush, Now Obama Note: First the Security or Police State then the Nanny State. This is a must-read article, and hopefully an eye-opener to those still stuck in the "left" or "right" paradigm of thinking of partisan politics, both of which pick and chose which parts of the Constitution they want to dismantle for desired ends. Put the Bush and Obama policies together, sprinkle in a couple more terrorist attacks, and one or two more state-caused financial calamities, and you have a recipe for . . . * The destruction of American liberty * The blossoming of a Leviathan State
0
POPSCyberbullying, A Legislative Act Toward Internet Inquisition? CATO explains what liberties are at stake in this legislation, which is much like the so-called "hate crime" bills. (All these are being manufactured and pushed by the ADL, the hypocritical defamers.) The Act goes far beyond the issue of unauthorized access, criminalizing any rude speech delivered via the internet, cell phone, or text message : ‘(a) Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person, using electronic means to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both .
1
POPSSupport the JUSTICE Act to Amend PATRIOT ACT Abuses This is about the Constitution and freedom for Americans from government intrusion. Read this and consider contacting your Congressmen immediately. This is a non-partisan issue. If conservative republicans in particular really support the Constitution they need to man-up and support this to really "defend freedom", instead of paying lip service to our liberties! What do you think 1776 was all about anyway? It was about restraining government from tyranny, in particular from the more conservative Tories under King George! Obama wants to continue the same Bush provisions...is that good....to sacrifice your precious liberties for "security"? You ought to know better than that: Those Who Would Sacrifice Liberty for Security Deserve Neither -- Ben Franklin "In short, the JUSTICE Act would give government agents powerful tools to spy on suspected terrorists, while preventing them from spying on YOU."
0
POPSPres. Andrew Jackson Warned against the Fed, a Private Central Bank This was his Veto letter for a private central Bank bill sent to him (under the guise of patriotism) on July 4th, 1832. The Fed, in principle, is precisely what he opposed, and his historic letter tells why. This is relevant because Congress is considering passing a bill to audit the Fed here and you can watch live Fri. Sept. 25th
1
POPSPASS ID Act "is REAL ID 2.0"--Same Federalized Drivers License/National ID Scheme This is like Blackwater changing its name to Xe. No real change, just a new "makeover" to sell it. This tramples the 10th amendment right of the states by pretending that the new federal Dept. of Homeland Tyranny has a right to dictate standards for drivers licenses to the States. It also attacks your 4th amendment privacy, by setting up the same desired data-mining capabilities to watch every 'free American" on demand. RFID included. Tell your Congressmen "no".
0
POPSA Federally Mandated Health Care System is Unconstitutional Congress has no authority to pass a federally mandated health care system through legislation, period, end of argument. The Constitution enumerates no such powers. What is taking place is a Usurpation of power to erect a health care system "with public options" (and penalties for not doing so). Fast forward to the 4:10 min. mark for the central arguments from Cato and Sekulow.
0
POPSObamaCare Patterned After RomneyCare Mitt Romney showed the democrats how to sneak this healthcare package past their constituents by hiding the true costs. (This is also just one good reason for republicans to not put up Romney as a future presidential candidate).
1
POPSGun Control Bill H.R. 45 Not a Hoax: Universal Licensing Requirement Updated. This article in a blog (inaccurately mentioning "Senate bill") was deleted, but the House Bill HR 45 is real (proof here at Thomas/Library of Congress) , not "an internet hoax", although not proceeding with any sponsors.. It was introduced on Jan. 6, 2009 before Obama's inauguration. This COULD happen, though it appears dead now. "Owning guns is not a right, but a privilege", will be their mantra--the 2nd amendment of the Constitution be damned. This was how your owning a car has been used against you too, first licensing, then collecting your SSN and other personal data, then attaching all kinds of other requirements (from draft registration to property taxes, child support payments, et al) in order to legally drive or even park a car that you purchased yourself as a "free American". Do not buy into this "privilege, not right" rhetoric which they will soon begin to parrot.
1
POPSUS Military Plans for H1N1 Flu Outbreak--Martial Law or State's Rights? Major pentagon planning for this new flu. Necessary? And who would decide such? Due to a Bush Executive Order (which Obama did not rescind) just one man, the President (not even Congress, or the States), has the authority to declare National Emergency and Martial Law for either economic or health "crisis" reasons . The Constitutional implications of this preparation have not been debated or discussed, particularly about State's rights. Each state has their own controlled "National Guard", and could decide for themselves, instead of a Federal power-grab over this very controversial issue. However the Federal government believes the MEHPA (Model Emergency Health Powers Act) trumps the 10th amendment. But does it? Not according to the Constitution.
8
POPSRachel Maddow Unmasks Obama, Legalizing Tyrannical Powers Even the left's Maddow sees past his stagecraft with excellent analysis provided, including a Film clip from Minority Report (Tom Cruise film)--a perfect illustration. How come so many others are still blind? The history of tyranny is one of its subtlety in coming under other pretenses and "necessary" measures. Obama is NOT "Mr. Constitution" but proposes a tyrannical new power which he is "developing a new legal framework for" PREVENTIVE DETENTION (contrary to the Constitution) . This will effect American lives, but is being constructed around "terrorism" in the context of strictly foreigners to sell it. Worth watching, though dated, very important. The principle is precisely the same as Bush's PREVENTIVE WAR , where America attacks on the basis of pure suspicion (read propaganda and lies), before any hostile actions are done.
3
POPSObama's Supreme Court Nominee on 2nd Amendment This is her view of the Constitution in part, particularly the 2nd amendment. Obama stated that her views on the Constitution were consistent with his own. Now his view is clear too then. The ten amendments in the Bill of Rights that defend our liberties are all connected, and rise or fall together.
3
POPSCATO--"Hate Crime" Laws Are Unconstitutional
"Hate crime" laws are "thought crime" laws, constitute "double jeopardy" (being tried twice for same crime), and violate the 1st and 14th (and also not mentioned, 10th) amendments of the Constitution, this scholar asserts. He also takes the ACLU to task since they ought to know better, and should lead the opposition. The ADL (hypocrites who defame many) is behind "hate crimes" legislation, and is the powerful, private, special interest, propaganda agency to federal and local law enforcement (including FBI) and media, who are the sole self-appointed definers of public orthodoxy and what constitutes "hate" or "hate groups", even "terrorism" watch lists! "Hate Crimes" laws could become the basis of a New American Inquisition , where a certain "orthodoxy" of thought, speech, religious or philosophical beliefs is upheld and requires punishment of all to the contrary. Think about the danger of this! What about "liberty of conscience" and freedom of speech?
4
POPSBiometrics: Government Gone Wild! Brain scans and "thought police" next? Paranoid security freaks and liberty-haters run both UK and US governments and the security merchandisers are eager to make profits from taxpayers for high-tech (and unconstitutional) toys that "search and seize" your personal effects without a warrant. Why are they so afraid of the people? Is it because they know people will resist such draconian control they want in place? Big Brother government is no "government of the people", but government above, and removed from, the people.
2
POPSHR 2159: A 2nd Amendment Revocation Act? The government only needs to label someone "suspect" (they arbitrarily think you might do something, without hard evidence?) and the definition of "terrorist" is very broad: (5) the term "domestic terrorism" means activities that - (A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; (B) appear to be intended – (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; A vehement protester could be labeled such. This is a Carte Blanche for the Feds to strip anyone they choose of their right to bear arms. In other words, you must be a passive, perfectly obedient, tame and mild SLAVE to keep your right to bear arms. When the British tried to seize the arms of Colonists the Revolutionary War began (Boston Massac
1
POPSBetter Than Tea Parties: Support "Enumerated Powers Act" Want to hold Congress accountable, and change it? This would require Congress to fulfill their oath of office, to abide by the Constitution, on every bill they pass, thus holding them accountable to the people before whom they took that oath. "A legislative act, contrary to the Constitution, is not law". --Supreme Court Justice John Marshall If they did not take their oath seriously, they are liars, and should be removed from office. Only those who want to violate that oath will refuse this bill, for there is no other reason to oppose it. Taking action here is more powerful than any Tea Party. "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined." -- James Madison, Federalist No. 45
3
POPSHomeland Security Wants to Re-Write REAL ID The CNN headline is entirely misleading. Read the clip. They just want better compliance with States and Napolean-itano is bargaining with governors, never mind the 10th amendment and by-passing what citizens think. It will still be a National ID card irregardless of what they name it, even if the original legislation is rescinded. The goal is still the Federalization of a State drivers license , which taps into everyone's Socialist Security Number and biometric data (including facial mapping photos) , therefore linking all financial (bank accounts), medical, legal, and personal credit record by hijacking state drivers licenses for surveillance and data-mining purposes --not to thwart terrorists, but to monitor, track "free Americans" at will, whenever they choose (because you all will comply and consent). This was all based upon 9/11 of course and the typical plea of "necessity" toward a Big Brother Security State.
6
POPSTea Party Blow-back: Republicans Lack Credibility and Trustworthiness This post from the conservative Cato Institute blog seals the point with a video of a republican Congressman getting booed at a Tea Party. They have a good pod cast on the subject, Reading the GOP's Tea Leaves (here) which shows that Neoconservatism must be rejected and is a cause of both Big Government and expansionist unjust wars. Republicans (and particularly the RINO establishment) are presently a part of the problem, not the solution. Neoconservatives (like Bush and the recent primary GOP candidates, all CFR members) are RINOs and not conservatives, constitutionalists, or for limited government as people like Pat Buchanan and Ron Paul have exposed.
0
POPSObama Pushing U.S. Citizen as Afghan President Obama's soft "insurgency" and interference into Afghanistan. Contrary to the words of Obama, "establishing democracy" and a Puppet Government is precisely what the US is trying to do in Afghanistan. Obama again unmasked. Now get this: His candidacy is seen as a direct violation of the Chapter Three, Article Sixty Two of Afghanistan's Constitution, which states that only an Afghan citizen has the right to run for president - which means that Jalali would have to apply for Afghan citizenship first.
2
POPSApril 15th: The Case Against the Income Tax Taxation is a barometer of citizens' freedom versus government power. Read further. Ron Paul clears the fog and the "radicalism" away from this suggestion with sober analysis: You may be surprised to know that the income tax accounts for only approximately one-third of federal revenue. Only 10 years ago, the federal budget was roughly one-third less than it is today. Surely we could find ways to cut spending back to 1990 levels, especially when the Treasury has single year tax surpluses for the past several years. So perhaps the idea of an America without an income tax is not so radical after all.
5
POPSThe "New Republicans" and their Global Republic This global "republican" vision by HG Wells explains alot about what we observe. It is their "brave new world" of world domination being accomplished. This is the vision of psychopaths, literally. Note its relation to revolutionary Freemasonry and its deistic "ethical system". Don't miss the last paragraph, kiss the Constitution (of their own making) good-bye. Nothing less than Eugenics (of which abortion places a role), racism, euthanasia, loss of human freedom to their elitist tyranny is entailed "for the good of mankind". Much of this can now be seen and observed, and people are tricked into subscribing to its radical principles of deciding who lives or dies, who is "worthy" of life and who is not. The entire article is worth reading and cannot be easily dismissed.
6
POPSBritain's (and America's) Secret Religion--Deism This recent article begins with "the world's most famous atheist" becoming a Deist, i.e. Professor Antony Flew. The reason was this: New scientific discoveries persuaded him, he said, “that intelligence must have been involved” in producing life. In other words, natural reason necessitates belief in a Creator. But the article goes on to describe the difference between Deism, Atheism, and Theism. Any discerning reading (contrary to modern Christian attempts) of America's founders and documents absolute supports that they were not Christians, but Deists, whom, like Thomas Paine, sometimes quoted the Bible, but denied its historical trustworthiness and inspiration, and denied miracles recorded, etc.. It appears Deism is likely to be revived as natural "intelligent design" (which is Deistic, but anti-scriptural philosophy) is made popular and too difficult to deny. Deism is incompatible with Christianity but compatible with Freemasonry, like the Founders.
1
POPS"Tax Tea Parties" Are Silly, Real Tax Revolt Needed These tea parties ignore the real truth that the IRS Commissioners and attorneys cannot produce any law that says that Americans must pay or file income taxes. BTW, an "income tax" is a key plank of communism, and America did just fine without it until 1913--a very unlucky year.
4
POPSObama Adopts Bush Policy on Domestic Spying This is a landmark moment. No 'change' here either. Was this not a major issue before, American freedoms and civil liberties from government instrusion? Will Democrats remain silent? Is a mere change of party--but not policy--enough?
1
POPSFBI Chief Pushes for PATRIOT ACT Provisions Renewal Stop the war on American's bill of rights, they may easily obtain warrants instead, which is the only way to "defend freedom" of Americans. Let your Congressmen know. Governments have always claimed "necessity" as the reason to justify more powers.
0
POPSNeoconservatives Still a Threat, Names and History Do not be fooled republicans! You can add Mark Levin to the list who talk about "limited government" yet believe in Unitary Executive , as well as the "noble lie" (e.g. Iraq war) to achieve political ends. Great video summary by Ron Paul, though dated, still very relevant.
1
POPSMark Levin Believes in "Unitary Executive", Not True Constitutionalist! It is plain to see that Mark Levin is being sprung on Republicans as if he is a "true conservative" and "original constitutionalist", yet he believes and supports fully what the Founders feared most--a "Unitary Executive" President, like George W. Bush Look at the gap in Levin's bio, between his graduation from Temple and IMMEDIATE involvement as "adviser to Reagan cabinet members" (i.e. no official post), which is being used to launch his political career. Now Sean Hannity calls this untried person who merely wrote a book (all his own thoughts?) as "The Great One". His book, meanwhile, subtitled "a Conservative Manifesto", smacks of an earlier popular release by Ron Paul called Revolution, A Manifesto , which is closer to pure Constitutionalist views of the Founders (who was wildly popular and still is as an advocate) than Levin's crafty piece. Levin is a neoconservative!
2
POPSU.S. Army Patrols Alabama After Shooting? This is what the State National Guard is for if it is considered that extreme. This is NOT the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army! The Governor should have told them to get out and used the guard if he was so skeered. See Posse Comitatus law which forbids this. Again, shooting blown way out of proportion to justify over-response.
0
POPS"Reasonable Search"? Airport Screening Goes X Rated Ironic, the laws also prevent "indecent exposure" publicly, except for this! The 4th amendment prohibits citizens from unreasonable search or seizure, so what is this? This is insane! PARANOIA fuels this which would not stop any determined terrorists. THIS POLICY IS FRANKLY RUDE AND ABUSIVE OF AIR TRAVELERS.
2
POPSWill Obama Support Inquiry into Unconstitutional Bush Policies? ...or not? The Bush Memos are creating pressure. Answer: No, he will find a way not to or a distraction to avoid it (like war). Obama is covering for Bush instead of "defending the Constitution of the United States", as he swore (as did the Usurper, Bush, too). These CFR members and elite cover for each other (its in their secret oaths), just like Pelosi (also CFR) said "impeachment is off the table" as soon as Democrats had a majority (power) in Congress and could. The only way Obama would "support" this important Constitutional investigation is if he established an "independent commission" much like the phony 911 Commission to cover it all up, or bury it in legal mumbo jumbo. Time to remove the partisan blindfolds. If Obama does not support this then he is obstructing justice and aiding and abetting Bush's abuse of Executive power, and would also therefore be just as untrustworthy.
9
POPSBush Memos: Constitution Suspended Under Plea of "Terrorism" Specifically the 4th and 5th amendments, and Posse Comitatus, which forbids the use of military for domestic policing. The dangerous plea of "necessity" and "war powers" was used. In other words, the Constitution was suspended (in factual actions) and America was under secret Martial Law.
1
POPSCPAC Straw Poll Vindicates Ron Paul, Huckabee Distanced Ron Paul in virtual tie for 2nd, with Palin, well above Huckabee. Conservatives, unlike the republican establishment, like Ron Paul's principles on economics, preserving Constitutional law and liberty, and apparently even foreign policy (surprise, surprise) over others . This shows that conservatives then are divided, and not ready to throw all their weight behind one lead candidate (i.e. Romney, a CFR member and RINO who has no real conservative or Constitutional record). It must be acknowledged that Ron Paul's principles are vindicated as attractive among conservatives, and been missing from the Republican party. While Romney won the poll this still means Republicans are out of touch with conservatives listening now to Paul outside the heat of political campaigns. The fact that he fairs so much better here than during the primaries (although he trampled Giuliani then) says that conservatives are awakening and listening to his message, finally.
7
POPSSen. Byrd Troubled, Warns Obama about Abuse of Power Sen Byrd (D), who raised issues about power with the Bush administration, is very evidently troubled about the abuse of power by the Obama administration. Byrd is the senior Senator and third in line of succession, therefore worthy of this counsel. If Obama does not heed him, of the same party, it will speak volumes. There is apparent reference to Obama's Justice Dept. which raised the issue of Executive Privilege itself to thwart investigation of the Bush administration in court. (See my Clipmark Obama Administration is Covering for Bush Administration ). Not a good sign, and all too familiar, which smacks of rule by Secrecy. Is there anything more anti-American, in the Constitution, than appointing "Czars"--unaccountable heads of agencies to do whatever they please? The term "Czar" has become all too familiar (Energy Czar, Drug Czar, etc) and accepted, always under the plea of "necessity".
Newest Clips
see Newest Clips
Pops
Comments
Tags
1
Most Pops
Print
Save
Turn on live update