askwhy's essene clipmarks

Newest Clips
see Newest Clips
  • See all clipmarks by askwhy
  • See all public essene clipmarks
  •    
     
     
     
       
     
    top scroll end
    0
    POPS
    Jesus Family Tomb
    askwhy
    by askwhy  3-5-2007   
     The rosette was a sign of Judah come down from Persian times when the Persians colonized the country and set up the Temple State of Yehud (417—BC). That rosette is still a symbol of both ancient nations. Who then would use the rosette other than fervent Jewish nationalists? And who were the fervent Jewish natinalists other than the Essenes. This could have been an Essene tomb and not a Jewish family tomb at all. The original archaeological reports by Amos Klonos need to be scrutinized for evidence of this, if it has not been erased by clumsy archaeology. The Essenes were not identical with the Nazarenes, and so the Nazarenes need not have known where the Essenes had buried their brother. The Nazarenes were converts to the idea of the kingdom coming soon, and need not have known much about the basic affiliations of their leader, but simply his immediately pressing principle which was an Essene principle—the world was about to end and Jews had to repent to get into it.
    0
    POPS
    Jesus Illigitimate and taken in by the Essenes
    askwhy
    by askwhy  3-5-2007   
     What this boils down to is that the early evidence of Jesus’s birth is that he was illigitimate. It is special pleading to say this conclusion is uncharitable because Mary claimed it was a miracle. It ought not to need saying that no Christian father would accept the same excuse for his daughter’s pregnancy, so there is nothing uncharitable about it. In those days, Greeks thought it possible for human women to be impregnated by gods, and it was used as an excuse in that culture, but no traditional Jewish culture was likely to accept it. The Christians who wrote the gospels were not traditional Jews. If they were Jews at all, they were writing for people in the Hellenized world outside Palestine where divine births were acceptable. The two birth narratives were quite plainly stuck on to the bios of Christ, and no scholar considers them to be anything other than myth. It leaves the notion of illigitimacy as the only explanation for Jesus being called the son of Mary. The question then is
    — end of the list —

    askwhy essene

    loading clips...
    Filter
    rss tools
    Clipmarks
    About   Clippers   Blog   Privacy   EULA   Copyright   Site Map   Forbes Digital

    OK