0
POPSLawfare - Terrorist attack US by demanding trials The author, a lawyer formally part of the Bush legal team declares: “ attorneys think that these decisions are better second-guessed by plaintiffs' lawyers and judges rather than our elected leaders.“ I always thought that was what the rule of law meant -- but if our leaders say it, it must be so ...
0
POPSCourt rejects Ohio domestic spying suit The Bush appointed judges ruled against the plaintiffs, because they failed to show they were subject to the surveillance... Since an essential part of the PATRIOT ACT (and related executive orders) is concealing any investigations from the individuals and organizations investigated and since the Bushites regularly invoke the need for “national security” secrecy to hide this information from the courts ... this appears to be a classic Catch 22 — You don’t have the right to challenge illegal domestic spying... because you can’t prove you have been subject to illegal domestic spying,,, because they don’t have to (or can refuse to) tell you that you have been subject to illegal domestic spying...
Newest Clips
see Newest Clips
2
Latest Pops
Latest Comments
Most Pops
Tags
Print
Save
Turn on live update