0
POPSHastings Court Prevents Defendant from Obeying the Ruling. This raises quite a few questions for the court and the press to research; 1. One could ask whether Hastings Court actually have any jurisdiction over a property placed in Spain? 2. If Hasting Court rules differently to the Spanish court…Which court order takes priority? 3. Why doesn’t DeCotta McKenna & Santafè not want to “waste the courts time” with a hearing? Could it be that the same law firm is more concerned with the fact that the Court in Spain have denied DeCotta, McKenna & Santafè`s Client any costs from 2004 and up till now, than they are about wasting court-time? 4. Could it be that the big law firm and especially Jon Sutton are not really keen on discussing the circumstances that have been going on in Spain and certainly do not want any questions asked about how the company could act on a mistranslated Court Order before it was even translated?
1
POPSMistranslation or Fraud by DeCotta, McKenna & Santafè ? The blogger has proof that one of DeCotta, McKenna & Santafè`s partners, Jon Sutton, has used fraud in order to bring Mr. Kirwan`s property in Spain on public auction. Jon Sutton had an English Court Order translated and brought to Spain. The translation altered the Court Order 180 degrees giving Mr. Kirwan`s ex. wife (and her lawyers) the right to conduct the sale of the Spanish property – when in fact Mr. Kirwan was given that right by the English court.
Newest Clips
see Newest Clips
Latest Pops
Latest Comments
Most Pops
Tags
Print
Save
Turn on live update