This is disgusting, through and through. These women were good enough to be the adopted parents of a 12-year-old child, and good enough to be responsible for this drug addicted infant when relatives could not be found, but now, for purely discriminatory and prejudiced reasons, this judge wants to take this child out of a loving home. Shame!

"The ruling said that he had agreed to allow the women to foster the child because it was the best option at the time."

What he means is that it was the "only" option at the time because nobody else would take the child, making the courts hypocrisy even more disgusting.

It means that someone has got into his ear. This judge is being influenced by the religious right.

It was and is the best option for this otherwise disadvantaged child. What could possibly be better than a loving family?
A hateful dogmatic repressive discriminatory legal system? Certainly not.
Who loses in this crime against humanity, the child of course. Will we ever wake up?