|
haha Wildcat, No room for people's stuff!! I love the fourth photo. I would live in most of these in a heartbeat Good point deb. Of course I'd move into most of these given half the chance. Sadly I actually wear clothes and eat food so they may not be too practical. Still, I can have my dream... Wow. Talk about minimal! Did you notice where most of these are placed? Only one of the pictures shows placement on top of a high-rise building. The rest are in the middle of a body of water, the dessert, or a countryside. It seems like from the size and mobility, they would best be suited for city life. Except, unless you can work a miracle and get a building or condo association to approve a fixture that sits on top of their Park Avenue penthouse in New York, the most likely place you could put one of these without all the hassle would be in a large open space away from the big cities. But why would you want to live in a shoebox in a very spacious environment? The architecture variation and mobility is neat.... I could make my stuff fit into the fifth one But not designed for families I guess... wildcat, by the way - fabulous clip great clip Wcat ! small confession: the big "boxes" humans normally live in, usually look 2me as a huge collection of gravestones. these pics show a much more reasonable option, much closer to a vision of a human living in an accommodation that is interwoven & accommodating its topographical landscape as well as its updated mental scape. good luck fellows .... Some of them you could keep in the garage ,take out, and put on a trailer like a two star caravan,.when you go on holidays. The materials these days mean they could be made with things that weren't too heavy. |
View the Top Clips from January 7, 2008
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
|
|
|