I'm all for consenting sex between two adults but on a personal note, I've never understood this sort of sex. I'm a gentle loving soul, who gets turned on by cuddling *LOL* and even people who enjoy "rough" sex kinda leave me bewildered. Having said that, there was an interesting question in the clip. Since he consented to this sort of sex play, can the other person be held responsible for his death?

Even though there was consent by both parties, the person performing the bondage knows there is an element of danger (thus the thrill of bondage). The danger of suffocation would be forseeable; thus, all precautions should have been taken to prevent accidental injury. If I remember my legal education correctly, LeBlanc would be negligent and therefore liable, regardless of consent by the injured party.

But I believe he ended any legal battles by taking his life.

The thing that bothers me is. Another higher up in the Corporate ladder, doing the weird thing. Does this mean that people who seek the ultimate power. May also seek the ultimate freak show?

Does this mean that people who seek the ultimate power?

The ultimate power trip, the ultimate orgasm, the utimate thrill . . . when is enough, enough Cptenaud? It's all very disturbing to me.