It's called survival of the fittest, get over it. You either conquer or you are conquered. Does that not sound like Nazism or one of those extreme right-wing American KKK gangs. Is someone posting not so secret code to his friend. I'm sure there is only the pair of them in it.

Wow. What a complete waste of text you typed again. Good thing electrons will recycle without your efforts. I JUST told you that this has been going on since the dawn of time, but you have to slap a 'nazi' label on everything. If it has been the norm since before the Nazi's of WWII came to power why didn't you historically reference that? Is that the extent of your political ...

It's called survival of the fittest, get over it. You either conquer or you are conquered. Does that not sound like Nazism or one of those extreme right-wing American KKK gangs. Is someone posting not so secret code to his friend. I'm sure there is only the pair of them in it.

Wow. What a complete waste of text you typed again. Good thing electrons will recycle without your efforts. I JUST told you that this has been going on since the dawn of time, but you have to slap a 'nazi' label on everything. If it has been the norm since before the Nazi's of WWII came to power why didn't you historically reference that? Is that the extent of your political agaenda? Everyone is a nazi to you. Look out for those black helicopters, there everywhere you know.

You've done it again, Nap. Another cockup. Does nothing go right for you. This is the FIFTH cockup on the trot. You are consistent at least. You certainly take after your neoCon buddies in you ability to get it consistently wrong, but with a different cockup each time. If you just took your time maybe, just maybe, you might get something correct. Does your excitement boil over when you're replying to me? Or have you had this problem all along and everyone is to polite to point it out?

So what is it this time. Well, in itself this is minor, but in the context of your recent history, the patern is pretty serious. You have taken two different commenter's replies and amalgamated them into one. ...

You've done it again, Nap. Another cockup. Does nothing go right for you. This is the FIFTH cockup on the trot. You are consistent at least. You certainly take after your neoCon buddies in you ability to get it consistently wrong, but with a different cockup each time. If you just took your time maybe, just maybe, you might get something correct. Does your excitement boil over when you're replying to me? Or have you had this problem all along and everyone is to polite to point it out?

So what is it this time. Well, in itself this is minor, but in the context of your recent history, the patern is pretty serious. You have taken two different commenter's replies and amalgamated them into one. You cannot be doing that. At the very least it is misleading, and dishonest. I know you don't consider this grave but in the context of all the other infringements, believe me, it's getting there.

Have you seen a doctor lately? A shrink would be a very good idea. It would be worth the cost in the end.
You've tried that before and it hasn't worked. Three times!!! Well what do you expect? Miracles? Are you even the right religion for miracles. Even god can't put back together that which was never there in the first place. Did you ever consider a different career? How about stone breaker? No, mentally draining. Ok, lightweight boxer? Soft jaw. Housewife? Wrong sex. Well, we knew that. That's where we started out, remember? Like the hole in the bucket? Square peg, round hole? Ha ha. What would be do if we could not laugh at misfortune?!

Stop digging, Nap. You're in way above your height.

Check out my comment here on 02-09-2007 @ 12.01am where I quote you ...

It's called survival of the fittest, get over it. You either conquer or you are conquered.

and responded.

On you comment on 02-09-2007 @ 2.10am you amalgamated my quote of you with my reply comment into one quote of mine. You cannot do that. It may be a simple mistake or cockup but in light of your list of more serious misuses and your inability to see you obvious mistake, then I must conclude that it's more sinister.

If you wish, I can again list your earlier 'mistakes', but really I have better things to be doing than helping som...

Stop digging, Nap. You're in way above your height.

Check out my comment here on 02-09-2007 @ 12.01am where I quote you ...

It's called survival of the fittest, get over it. You either conquer or you are conquered.

and responded.

On you comment on 02-09-2007 @ 2.10am you amalgamated my quote of you with my reply comment into one quote of mine. You cannot do that. It may be a simple mistake or cockup but in light of your list of more serious misuses and your inability to see you obvious mistake, then I must conclude that it's more sinister.

If you wish, I can again list your earlier 'mistakes', but really I have better things to be doing than helping someone who just does not get it and never will.

Is there nothing useful that you could do? Go shooting with Cheney? Join the military, if you are old enough? Stunt car driving? Gorge jumping? There must be something to get you out of the house. Visit Iraq? Something for the good of the rest of humanity. Ha ha.

I have it. Chief Dresser for the Emperor with No Clothes. Perfect for someone with your abilities, don't you think? We'd never see your mistakes then. Ha ha. Or the Snow job, might suit?