POP for science!

They are also poorer.

And they have a smaller carbon footprint.

And most of them would probably be willing to debate.

i beleive that more that 32k people are smarter than Al Gore.
http://www.stiriaz.com/social/mediafax/uraganele-nu-sunt-provocate-de-incalzirea-globala.php

So, is it okay now to just cut down the Amazon forest and let autos and jet planes pollute the air? Forget about the permafrost melting in the Arctic? Hmmm? It sure would profit someone to just forget about lobal warming now wouldn't it. Just not Al Gore, your whippin' post for tellin'g us what's goin' on, along with a lot more than those 32,000 deniers. So there's not a consensus... just forget about it.

stuck g again on global

Willhelm, one year ago a GW clip like this got at most 5-6 pops. This one collected 11 which gives some hope for a good tendency.

"Forget about the permafrost melting in the Arctic"

Apparently *you* are forgetting that it's melting in some areas, and getting thicker in others.

You know, kind of like it can be sunny in California and raining in Seattle? Antarctica is a *really* big place.

Oh, and the "endangered" polar bears are far more numerous than they were 30 years ago. The fact that you've heard something a lot doesn't prove anything more than the fact that a lot of people believe it.

I think it's sad that Al Gore wants to destroy the environment.