invictus says: A blogger in Iran, known for his opposition to the government, is missing since May 26. yet another reminder (at least for me) of how much we take for granted. we sit here on clipmarks, sharing our ideas and debating the worlds issues. many of us, myself included, are often very critical of the U.S. government. yet this courageous person, trying to truly enlighten the world about thruths that are otherwise hidden, runs the risk of being arrested and who knows what else because his governemnt is truly HORRIBLE!!! thanks for posting this clip invictus. Truly a reminder of the freedoms some people forget to appreciate. This story also proves the power of blogging as a way of free speech and free communication. Tyrans do not fear invaders' armies, fighter jets and bombs, as much as they fear free speech and communication of their own people. There are many Irans on the world but we can't just fix things by toppling the governments down and export "democracy" to those countries. The "real thing" is the people's own determination and courageous struggle for freedom and democracy, without a need of foreign military aid. Compared to Iran, we enjoy the free speech (most of us) and we owe this comfort to our grandfathers who fought to tyranny bravely long time ago. While appreciating the value of our freedom, we... *sigh* Invictus... I respect you enough that I read that whole "sage-like" book you typed. I must say, you have a way with words my friend. Very eloquent indeed and I concur with much of it. What makes it all so much worse is when you realise the freedoms you take for granted are not universal truths worldwide. There are MANY who have ever even heard of freedom of speech or expression. They don't even know its an issue. As the world 'awakens' to the concept of freedom there will be those in power and those loyal to the 'old ways' that will fight to preserve them. When someone 'breaks the old rules' they must be dealt with. I believe we will never see that blogger alive again. The only way to affect change in that type of society is to change the thinking of the masses. However, I don't believe public outcry hold much sway in that type of society. It would have to be done thru education and generational grooming. invictus - very nicely stated. What you say makes a lot of sense. Unfortunately it only does so for the people who believe in similar principles. Freedom is a wonderful thing... but just like anything else - it can be abused for a wide variety of reasons and agendas. Striving for what you suggest is very noble and hopefully societies will move in that direction, but as we've seen and keep seeing in too many countries - surrendering your defense mechanisms and simply going with purely your sentiments will do nothing but get you killed. Because even though you may not believe and do such a terrible act - there are plenty who will without a second thought. They have their reasons, they ha... Just deserts for an obvious agent provocateur under tthe direction and control of The Evil Emperor Chimp! Merican, can I get a witness, my Sister?! If my predictions and senses are right, it's just a matter of few years (maybe less) for the present oppressive regime of Iran to collapse. Iran is far more different than Pakistan, Afghanistan and most of the Arab countries. There is a serious opposition movement out there, both "legal" and underground; and a well-educated urban youth, artists and intellectuals, and more important than this, a growing part of national bourgeoisy is fed up with the Islamic regime and its oppression. It is very likely that, in a couple of years or even earlier, a "spark" will be enough there for a serious uprising. The present administrators embrace the idea of a crisis between the West (especially U.S.) and... invictus, I agree with your senses... I've met a number of Iranians here who pretty much fit your description of them... the only problem, or crisis, if you will is this nuclear situation. I hope you'll agree with me that the current president of Iran is a madman. But, he controls the buttons, if you know what I mean. If he gets a nuclear weapon - things get really complicated potentially, really fast. He could use it against another country, he could give it to someone else to use... If it wasn't for this one issue - waiting out the few years would certainly be the right approach, but in this case - I don't think we have that kind of time. Merican, can I get a witness, my Sister?!Nobody can ever accuse you of not being hip! RecordSage, you know, here in Turkey we live next door to that "madman" and the idea of such a fanatical and dangerous administration having nukes is much more disturbing if it's your border neighbor. But it seems, for taking the nuclear weapons in hand, Iran would need a really long time- probably six to ten years, as some experts argue. (I don't know much about nuclear processes and technology.) I feel, Iranian regime is being prepared for another thing: forcing a crisis with the West which would help them to take new measures and to settle down the unrest in homeland by employing more oppressive methods like a martial law, pointing out the "national security" issues and declaring a state of emergency. I'm sure it's tough to have such a 'neighbor'... but I'm not sure about the crisis with the West just to allow them to take new measures. That's a very risky deal for them. Do you think just for that he's willing to risk his life and his power? The way I see it if he forces US to abandon current diplomatic attack and there's a military attack, regardless of how it turns out - he's definitely going to be gone - alive or dead, but he'll be gone, just like saddam... so that's why it doesn't make sense to me that he wouldn't realize this as well as I do. Monday, May 22, 2006 Washington — Atty. Gen. Alberto Gonzales said Sunday he believes journalists can be prosecuted for publishing information, citing an obligation to national security. “There are some statutes on the book which, if you read the language carefully, would seem to indicate that that is a possibility,” Gonzales said, referring to prosecutions. “We have an obligation to enforce those laws. We have an obligation to ensure that our national security is protected.” In recent months, journalists have been called into court to testify as part of investigations into leaks, including the unauthorized disclosure of a CIA operative’s name as well as the National Security Agency’s war... And of course now in the United States they may arrest you secretly and without warrent, take you to a secret prison and hold you indefinitely without hearing or trial or send you via extraordinary rendition to a country where you can and will be tortured. Amazing how these things happen and you and amaruca are still evading capture and torture. Simply amazing. Washington — Atty. Gen. Alberto Gonzales said Sunday he believes journalists can be prosecuted for publishing information, citing an obligation to national security.Excellent news, Athyrius, I missed that story. Thanks for clipping. |
View the Top Clips from June 5, 2006
|
||
|
|
|||
|
New from the makers of Clipmarks: Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!
|
|||