"What journalists are supposed to do"

Search Options	close
Search the following clips: All Clips

news science politics food economy art
technology health internet religion psychology

Sign Up Install Learn More Login


	"What journalists are supposed to do"

ratilfar

10-31-2009 9:43 AM

84 views

tags:

david brooks, necocons, not a journalist, unnamed sources, war, afghanistan, obama

ratilfar says:

Except David Brooks is not a journalist and shows it by doing exactly what so called journos for the Post, Times and the networks do all the time: Play the unnamaned sources game and serve as amplifiers for the neocons.

1 Comment |

Add a Comment

10-31-2009 1:14 PM

cptenaud

I cant help but notice when ever I see this guy. He looks like an indecisive whinny little goofball.

Terrible thing when Americans listen to Whinny little goofballs.

But then its only the 27% repugs with no brains of their own.

Login to Comment. Not a member yet? Sign up

Today's Top Clips

visit the Top Clips page

View the Top Clips from October 31, 2009

Embed This Clip In Your Site...

<div style="margin: 12px 0px; font-family: arial; color: #333333; background: #ffffff; border: solid 4px #e5e5e5; width: 100%; clear: left;"><div class="CM_CTB_Content_Wrap" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;background-color: #ffffff;"><div style="border-bottom: solid 1px #dcdcdc; white-space: nowrap; margin-bottom: 8px; background-color: #eeeeee ;background-image: url(http://clipmarks.com/images/source-bg.gif); background-repeat: repeat-x; height: 24px; line-height: 24px; vertical-align: middle; padding-bottom: 4px; color: #666666; font-size: 10px;" ><a href="http://clipmarks.com/clip-to-blog/" title="see clips that are hot right now"><img src="http://content.clipmarks.com/blog_embed/f56977d0-3f6f-439e-aff1-8b0fd3379910/EBC5E388-D62D-4766-8424-2C144401D259/" alt="" width="19" height="19" border="0" style="vertical-align: middle; margin: 0px 4px; display: inline; border: none; float:none;" /></a>clipped from <a title="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2009/10/30/brooks/index.html" href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2009/10/30/brooks/index.html" style="font-size: 11px;">www.salon.com</a></div><blockquote style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;" cite="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2009/10/30/brooks/index.html"><P><A href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/30/opinion/30brooks.html?hp">David Brooks today says</A> he wanted to write a column about Obama's pending decision over Afghanistan, and in order to write this column, this is what he tells us he did:  "For the past few days <STRONG>I have tried to do what journalists are supposed to do</STRONG>."  Sounds intrepid.  What, exactly, is it that "journalists are supposed to"?</P></blockquote><div style="height: 2px; font-size: 2px; background: #dcdcdc; border-bottom: solid 1px #f5f5f5; margin: 2px 4px;"></div><blockquote style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;" cite="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2009/10/30/brooks/index.html"><P>As he describes it, Brooks "called around to several of the smartest military experts [he] know[s] to get their views on these controversies."  These are people "who follow the war for a living."  He wrote down (at least some of) what they said.  He then passed it on without quoting -- or even identifying -- a single one of these experts.  That's his whole column.</P></blockquote><div style="height: 2px; font-size: 2px; background: #dcdcdc; border-bottom: solid 1px #f5f5f5; margin: 2px 4px;"></div><blockquote style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;" cite="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2009/10/30/brooks/index.html">In a shocking coincidence, the views of these unnamed, handpicked, anonymous "experts" all happen to coincide perfectly with <A href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/09/25/brooks/index.html">Brooks's own warrior views</A> and, more generally, with clichéd neoconservative pablum:</blockquote></div><div style="margin: 0px 6px 6px 4px;"><table style="font-size: 11px;border-spacing: 0px;padding: 0px;" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tr><td style="background:transparent;border-width:0px;padding:0px;">&nbsp;</td><td align="right" style="background:transparent;border-width:0px;padding:0px;width:107px" width="107"><a href="http://clipmarks.com/share/EBC5E388-D62D-4766-8424-2C144401D259/blog/" title="blog or email this clip"><img src="http://content7.clipmarks.com/images/c2b-foot.png" border="0" alt="blog it" width="107" height="17" style="border-width:0px;padding:0px;margin:0px;" /></a></td></tr></table></div></div>

New from the makers of Clipmarks: Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!

Clipmarks: Home; New Clips; Top Clips; Dashboard

Popular Topics: News; Life; Science; Technology; Entertainment

Get Started: Sign Up; Install Clipping Tool; How Clipping Works; Clip-to-Blog™; ClipSearch

Tools and Resources: FAQ; ClipWeek; Top Clippers; Top Tags; Site Map

About Clipmarks: About Us; Contact; Copyright; Privacy; EULA

Search Options

Today's Top Clips