From a statement by the AP:

We have not ignored the questions about our work raised by the U.S. military and ...the Iraqi Interior Ministry. Indeed, we published those questions while also sending AP journalists back out to the scene...

What we found were more witnesses who described the attack in particular detail... We ran a lengthy story on those additional findings, as well as the questions, on Nov. 28.

Some of AP's critics question the existence of police Capt. Jamil Hussein, who was one (but not the only) source to tell us about the burning.

These critics cite a U.S. military officer and an Iraqi official who first said Hussein is not an authorized spokesman and later said h...

From a statement by the AP:

We have not ignored the questions about our work raised by the U.S. military and ...the Iraqi Interior Ministry. Indeed, we published those questions while also sending AP journalists back out to the scene...

What we found were more witnesses who described the attack in particular detail... We ran a lengthy story on those additional findings, as well as the questions, on Nov. 28.

Some of AP's critics question the existence of police Capt. Jamil Hussein, who was one (but not the only) source to tell us about the burning.

These critics cite a U.S. military officer and an Iraqi official who first said Hussein is not an authorized spokesman and later said he is not on their list of Interior Ministry employees. It’s worth noting that such lists are relatively recent creations of the fledgling Iraqi government.

By contrast, Hussein is well known to AP. We first met him, in uniform, in a police station, some two years ago. We have talked with him a number of times since then and he has been a reliable source of accurate information on a variety of events in Baghdad.

No one – not a single person – raised questions about Hussein’s accuracy or his very existence in all that time. Those questions were raised only after he was quoted by name describing a terrible attack in a neighborhood that U.S. and Iraqi forces have struggled to make safe.

...

...various militias have been accused of operating within the Interior Ministry, which controls the police and has long worked to suppress news of death-squad activity in its ranks. (This is the same ministry that questioned Capt. Hussein’s existence and last week announced plans to take legal action against journalists who report news that creates the impression that security in Iraq is bad, “when the facts are totally different.”)

[1]

and they still haven't produced any real witnesses.

Wrong. The AP found three eyewitnesses who confirmed the details of the attack. [2]. The witnesses don't want to be named because they fear for their lives, probably from the Shi'ite dominated Interior Ministry which unsurprisingly wants to discredit the AP report and from whom conservative bloggers now treat as a credible source on the factuality of Shi'ite attacks on Sunnis.

Moreover, the AP has confirmed the attack with hospital and morgue workers. [3

There ...

read more»

and they still haven't produced any real witnesses.

Wrong. The AP found three eyewitnesses who confirmed the details of the attack. [2]. The witnesses don't want to be named because they fear for their lives, probably from the Shi'ite dominated Interior Ministry which unsurprisingly wants to discredit the AP report and from whom conservative bloggers now treat as a credible source on the factuality of Shi'ite attacks on Sunnis.

Moreover, the AP has confirmed the attack with hospital and morgue workers. [3

There has been many more inconstancies found in the AP story

I would be curious to know what "inconstancies" have been found.

First of all, it was not my intent to make fun of the inconsistencies typo. I put it in quote marks to indicate my skepticism that there truly are inconsistencies. I don't know why I reproduced the typo in my own comment, maybe I just cut and pasted from n2sooners comment, maybe I reproduced the typo on my own. I don't think that making fun of typos is really productive, because I make a ton of them as well.

Second, n2sooners is correct that that is an inconsistency, but I don't see it as a fatal one, especially since it does not involve inconsistencies among eyewitness accounts. The simplest explanation is this: the person who wrote the thing about hospital and morgue workers ju...

First of all, it was not my intent to make fun of the inconsistencies typo. I put it in quote marks to indicate my skepticism that there truly are inconsistencies. I don't know why I reproduced the typo in my own comment, maybe I just cut and pasted from n2sooners comment, maybe I reproduced the typo on my own. I don't think that making fun of typos is really productive, because I make a ton of them as well.

Second, n2sooners is correct that that is an inconsistency, but I don't see it as a fatal one, especially since it does not involve inconsistencies among eyewitness accounts. The simplest explanation is this: the person who wrote the thing about hospital and morgue workers just had his facts wrong. The author of that statement was AP International Editor John Daniszewski, who I am 99% sure is not part of the team reporting on the Mustafa attack. The AP's website reproduces the statements and leaves that part off.

But wait, here is another AP story that not only claims hospital and morgue workers as witnesses, but even names the hospital.

Two workers at Kazamiyah Hospital said the
bodies from the clashes and immolations had been taken to the morgue at
their facility. They refused to be identified by name, saying they
feared retribution.

But that brings up another problem. The Kazamiyah hospital is in hardline Shi'ite community. The victims were Sunni. And in between where the attack supposedly happened and the Kazamiyah hospital is the al-Nouman Hospital which is in the Sunni neighborhood of Adham...

But wait, here is another AP story that not only claims hospital and morgue workers as witnesses, but even names the hospital.

Two workers at Kazamiyah Hospital said the
bodies from the clashes and immolations had been taken to the morgue at
their facility. They refused to be identified by name, saying they
feared retribution.

But that brings up another problem. The Kazamiyah hospital is in hardline Shi'ite community. The victims were Sunni. And in between where the attack supposedly happened and the Kazamiyah hospital is the al-Nouman Hospital which is in the Sunni neighborhood of Adhamiyah. Why would they pass up a hospital in a friendly community to go to one further away in hostile community?

Those are good questions, but there's a problem here: its hard to argue that these inconsistencies are indicative that the attack never happened, and was a fabrication by Sunnis trying to demonize the Shi'ites. Think about: it. You have a policeman and three Sunni eyewitnesses from the neighborhood who say the attack happened. You have the guy who recanted AFTER being "interviewed" by the Interior Ministry. You have workers in a supposedly Shi'ite hospital saying the bodies went there. You happen to have one eyewitness who says he buried the victims after the gunbattel, presumably right away (although that's not explicitly stated). Who is lying? If the Sunnis in the neighborhood who...

Those are good questions, but there's a problem here: its hard to argue that these inconsistencies are indicative that the attack never happened, and was a fabrication by Sunnis trying to demonize the Shi'ites. Think about: it. You have a policeman and three Sunni eyewitnesses from the neighborhood who say the attack happened. You have the guy who recanted AFTER being "interviewed" by the Interior Ministry. You have workers in a supposedly Shi'ite hospital saying the bodies went there. You happen to have one eyewitness who says he buried the victims after the gunbattel, presumably right away (although that's not explicitly stated). Who is lying? If the Sunnis in the neighborhood who claim to have seen the immolations occur are lying, why would workers in a Shi'ite hospital collaborate the lies regarding a Shi'ite atrocity?

What is more likely, that there is some grand (yet sloppy) conspiracy among all of the people to conjure up a brutal attack out of thin air, or that the attack did happen and that some misunderstanding or some unknown facts explain these discrepancies?

You have a bunch of anonymous witnesses

Um, yeah. They are Sunnis afraid of the Shi'ite dominated Interior Ministry.

And one witness who claims to be a police officer but who the government says doesn't work for them.

The quote from the AP in my first comment addressed this.

You have conflicting and illogical witness stories.

The only contradiction is ONE witness who says that he took the six victims to bury them in a graveyard, vs a couple of hospital workers who say the victims were brought there. Saying that "everyone is lying; the event never happened" is NOT the only way to reconcile these stories.

And if this police office...

read more»

You have a bunch of anonymous witnesses

Um, yeah. They are Sunnis afraid of the Shi'ite dominated Interior Ministry.

And one witness who claims to be a police officer but who the government says doesn't work for them.

The quote from the AP in my first comment addressed this.

You have conflicting and illogical witness stories.

The only contradiction is ONE witness who says that he took the six victims to bury them in a graveyard, vs a couple of hospital workers who say the victims were brought there. Saying that "everyone is lying; the event never happened" is NOT the only way to reconcile these stories.

And if this police officer is so well known to the AP, why is he only an AP source and why has he seemingly disappeared since this story broke?

The policeman did not disappear. The AP reporter(s) got him to confirm the story TWICE after doubts were raised about the it--one of those times they walked into his office at the police station.

And if he is a police officer, why is he the only one who knows about this event?

Given you have three independent eyewitness accounts, he obviously [b]isn't]/b] the only one who knows about this event.

Why didn't he fill out a report?

Who says he didn't? Maybe his report is gathering dust along with all the other reports about the brutal atrocities that go on in Baghdad.

Two problems with that story. First is the spelling of the name, which is a minor problem, but something you would think they would get right since they went so far as to get his middle name. Second is the station since the AP has reported that their contact was transfered out of that station to another station.

And for even more breaking news, Michelle Malkin called the military and got in touch with the Civilian Police Advisory Training Team who told here they have an officer who claims to be the AP source. His name is CPT Jamil Ghdaab and he is currently being questioned about the burning Sunnis incident. Of course, the big question is how reliable is a police witness who lies about his ...

Two problems with that story. First is the spelling of the name, which is a minor problem, but something you would think they would get right since they went so far as to get his middle name. Second is the station since the AP has reported that their contact was transfered out of that station to another station.

And for even more breaking news, Michelle Malkin called the military and got in touch with the Civilian Police Advisory Training Team who told here they have an officer who claims to be the AP source. His name is CPT Jamil Ghdaab and he is currently being questioned about the burning Sunnis incident. Of course, the big question is how reliable is a police witness who lies about his own name to reporters? Also seems there is at least one other story out there where he was the source of some questionable information that didn't coincide with other official reports.

None of this still answers any of the questions of the actual story. Such as where are these four mosques that were burned? Officials only found one with minor damage. Who are the victims? There was only one name released by an anon source. That name also happens to be identical to someone who was reported kidnapped in September. This whole story was in question BEFORE the source came into question. The source actually came into question because of this story.

Also, the Jamail Hussein that may have recently been discovered at the Yarmouk station. The AP reported that their source used to work at Yarmouk, but has more recently been working from al-Khadra. So I would say it is too soon to dra...

None of this still answers any of the questions of the actual story. Such as where are these four mosques that were burned? Officials only found one with minor damage. Who are the victims? There was only one name released by an anon source. That name also happens to be identical to someone who was reported kidnapped in September. This whole story was in question BEFORE the source came into question. The source actually came into question because of this story.

Also, the Jamail Hussein that may have recently been discovered at the Yarmouk station. The AP reported that their source used to work at Yarmouk, but has more recently been working from al-Khadra. So I would say it is too soon to draw any conclusions.

There was also supposed to be some big breaking news about this on Winds of Change last night according to Patterico, but nothing there as of yet.