sillysam says: Soaring rhetoric, indeed. Finally, channeling Bill Clinton’s “is-is” parsing, Obama attempted to argue that his dubious veep selection committee members don’t really “work” for him: “They’re performing that job well. It’s a volunteer, unpaid position. And they’re giving me information, and I will then exercise judgment in terms of who I want to select as a vice presidential candidate. So these aren’t folks who are working for me, they’re not people I have assigned to a particular job in a future administration.” There are only so many gaffes, missteps, mistakes, flubs, and self-delusional statements one can make before serial naivete becomes endemic stupidity. Obama has reached the point of no return. This is a witch hunt. Vetting is a skill. He hired skilled vetters. He gave them criteria to look for. They are not policy shapers. Phil Graham is, though. Picking the VP doesn't in any way shape policy? Masbury, I know that he is your guy, but if you are going to run on change you better steer clear of business as usual practices. And how do we know these guys won't have BHO's ear? “Tangential”? He appointed them to search for his second in command.That's good. Vetting is a skill. He hired skilled vetters.No. He hired elitist celebrities. But that is a funny comment. Skill? If it is a skill, then what is the experience of these vetters at vetting. They are merely party hacks and elitist celebrities meant to make sure that Obama's choice is politically viable with as little potential embarrassment as possible. Oh, by the way, given that Obama's experience does not lend credibilityto his being a presidential candidate, who will he pick to provide gravitas to t... |
View the Top Clips from June 11, 2008
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
New from the makers of Clipmarks: Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!
|
||||