STATEMENT OF THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INAUDE ‐CLAIRE MALTON V. CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY CELEBRITY CENTER OF PARIS
http://www.rehabilitatenz.co.nz/pages/scientology-france-trial.html

This case arises out of the main civil party’s brief participation in Scientology religious services in 1998, including the study of Scientology scriptures and spiritual counseling. After five months, this civil party decided Scientology was not for her and quit the Church.

In September 2006, after eight years of investigation, the Prosecutor requested that the investigation be dismissed and that no charges be brought against the Church or any individual. The Prosecutor reasoned that there was no evidence ...

STATEMENT OF THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INAUDE ‐CLAIRE MALTON V. CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY CELEBRITY CENTER OF PARIS
http://www.rehabilitatenz.co.nz/pages/scientology-france-trial.html

This case arises out of the main civil party’s brief participation in Scientology religious services in 1998, including the study of Scientology scriptures and spiritual counseling. After five months, this civil party decided Scientology was not for her and quit the Church.

In September 2006, after eight years of investigation, the Prosecutor requested that the investigation be dismissed and that no charges be brought against the Church or any individual. The Prosecutor reasoned that there was no evidence of any wrongdoing and that the defendants have no commercial motivation or objectives and they sincerely believe
they are helping people.

Since that time no new facts have emerged that would support an indictment. Nevertheless, on 8 September 2008, the investigating Judge
sent the case to trial.