GW hard to believe

Thank you for your honesty. So, you "believe" it.

You do not understand it.
You do not know the science around it?
You have not read the IPCC reports.
You haven't read the scientists who support it and weigh the evidence against the scientists who don't ( more don't support it by the way).

However, you do point to a very interesting issue...

What amazes me is that a large group of people believe a sky daddy came
down and impregnated a virgin that gave birth to another version of
himself and rose from the dead to save us all with out the slightest
shred of evidence that the story is true. And that same group finds GW
hard to believe.

Your fa...

GW hard to believe

Thank you for your honesty. So, you "believe" it.

You do not understand it.
You do not know the science around it?
You have not read the IPCC reports.
You haven't read the scientists who support it and weigh the evidence against the scientists who don't ( more don't support it by the way).

However, you do point to a very interesting issue...

What amazes me is that a large group of people believe a sky daddy came
down and impregnated a virgin that gave birth to another version of
himself and rose from the dead to save us all with out the slightest
shred of evidence that the story is true. And that same group finds GW
hard to believe.

Your faith is a blind and ignorant faith. The faith in God ( and a Christian God in particular) stands the test of libraries full of philosophy, apologetics, beautifully consistent theology, history, witnesses and examples of the lives who've lived their faith.

But, then you have Algore.

You haven't read the scientists who support it and weigh the evidence against the scientists who don't ( more don't support it by the way).

You know that's a lie. Lying is a sin. You're so goin' to hell.

The faith in God ( and a Christian God in particular) stands the test of libraries full of philosophy, apologetics, beautifully consistent theology, history, witnesses and examples of the lives who've lived their faith

Any religion could make that claim. In fact, if you're going to use the popularity of a belief as proof of its worth, you've got yourself a little bit of a logical problem -- the vast majority of the world isn't Christian. In other words...

You haven't read the scientists who support it and weigh the evidence against the scientists who don't ( more don't support it by the way).

You know that's a lie. Lying is a sin. You're so goin' to hell.

The faith in God ( and a Christian God in particular) stands the test of libraries full of philosophy, apologetics, beautifully consistent theology, history, witnesses and examples of the lives who've lived their faith

Any religion could make that claim. In fact, if you're going to use the popularity of a belief as proof of its worth, you've got yourself a little bit of a logical problem -- the vast majority of the world isn't Christian. In other words, you could say that the idea that Christianity is wrong is more popular than the idea that it's right.

By your "reasoning," you have to give up Christianity. It's the only logical course you've left yourself.

Wisco, I've had these debates for 2 years a clipmarks and not one single time has any ever provided one scientific fact that supports global warming.

That is such obvious bullshit that you wish there were a stronger word for bullshit. You're telling me that for two years, no one has pointed out that pumping millions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere and changing its chemical makeup might have some adverse effects? Seriously?

You brought up the IPCC report. You know the facts. You're just such a brainwashed right wing zombie that you don't want to believe it.

If you're that committed to preserving your ignorance, I can't help you. There's absolutely nothing I can do ...

Wisco, I've had these debates for 2 years a clipmarks and not one single time has any ever provided one scientific fact that supports global warming.

That is such obvious bullshit that you wish there were a stronger word for bullshit. You're telling me that for two years, no one has pointed out that pumping millions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere and changing its chemical makeup might have some adverse effects? Seriously?

You brought up the IPCC report. You know the facts. You're just such a brainwashed right wing zombie that you don't want to believe it.

If you're that committed to preserving your ignorance, I can't help you. There's absolutely nothing I can do to magically make you stop preferring stupidity to reality. You've made your choice and you've chosen ignorance. Luckily, we don't need cranks like you. You're outside the mainstream -- like people who believe they were kidnapped by UFOs.

Enjoy your crankhood, culty.

I don't have to, [url="http://www.greenfacts.org/climate-change/ipcc/ipcc.htm"}the case has been made[/url]. The debate is over. Only those wedded to their ignorance deny it -- like people who still think the world is flat. Nothing I can do will wise you up and, frankly, I don't give a damn if you ever do.

I suppose I could point out that the world's lost 2 trillion tons of ice since 2003, but I doubt that'd make a dent in your self-constructed wall of ignorance.

The irony here is that you'll believe bullshit fairytales about talking snakes and magic apples, but you won't believe the scientific c...

I don't have to, [url="http://www.greenfacts.org/climate-change/ipcc/ipcc.htm"}the case has been made[/url]. The debate is over. Only those wedded to their ignorance deny it -- like people who still think the world is flat. Nothing I can do will wise you up and, frankly, I don't give a damn if you ever do.

I suppose I could point out that the world's lost 2 trillion tons of ice since 2003, but I doubt that'd make a dent in your self-constructed wall of ignorance.

The irony here is that you'll believe bullshit fairytales about talking snakes and magic apples, but you won't believe the scientific consensus on climate change.

Seriously, you're a chump -- mostly because you choose to be.

Wow. That was a great case.

You should do some clipmarks mining.

http://clipmarks.com/clipper/willhelm/clipcast/global+warming/

Then, tell us what the Earth's temperature is supposed to be. Then, explain all the simultaneous warming occurring throughout the solar system over the past decade.

Then, learn a little about obliquity and how the peak obliquity is waning.

Then, learn that the number one greenhouse gas is water vapor, which after warming occurs by solar irradiance, increases in the atmosphere and causes the increase in CO2.

Then, explain how co2 increase follows warming, it does not precede it, and still fits into the alar...

Wow. That was a great case.

You should do some clipmarks mining.

http://clipmarks.com/clipper/willhelm/clipcast/global+warming/

Then, tell us what the Earth's temperature is supposed to be. Then, explain all the simultaneous warming occurring throughout the solar system over the past decade.

Then, learn a little about obliquity and how the peak obliquity is waning.

Then, learn that the number one greenhouse gas is water vapor, which after warming occurs by solar irradiance, increases in the atmosphere and causes the increase in CO2.

Then, explain how co2 increase follows warming, it does not precede it, and still fits into the alarmist rant.

I could go on, but frankly, you are an ignorant loon that has no interest in anything but thinking you have the slightest clue what the Hell you are talking about.

IPCC, 2004, pg. 94. "an anthropogenic cause for recent warming has not been determined". The wheels have been falling off the idiot wagon for 4 years now.

That's selective quoting and you know it, culty. Do I need to remind you again that bearing false witness is a sin? 2004 isn't the most recent report. Try this if you're interested in anything other than bullshit. Picking and choosing your "facts" only proves your dishonesty. In any case, you wouldn't listen to the facts anyway.

So, oh dear, I've failed to educate the ineducable. What a huge surprise. Ten bucks says you've got a beef with evolution, too.

Seriously, give me one good reason why I should waste my time arguing with some internet troll who denies what he sees happening right in front of his face? Why should I ex...

That's selective quoting and you know it, culty. Do I need to remind you again that bearing false witness is a sin? 2004 isn't the most recent report. Try this if you're interested in anything other than bullshit. Picking and choosing your "facts" only proves your dishonesty. In any case, you wouldn't listen to the facts anyway.

So, oh dear, I've failed to educate the ineducable. What a huge surprise. Ten bucks says you've got a beef with evolution, too.

Seriously, give me one good reason why I should waste my time arguing with some internet troll who denies what he sees happening right in front of his face? Why should I explain that losing 2 trillion tons of ice is a bad thing?

Give me one good reason why I should waste my time on some fool who won't ever change his mind? What the hell would be the point?

Go peddle your crank theories someplace else, culty. No one's interested.