Merican says: Felon AND plagiarist Really reaching. Terrorist is never used in the case of non-human, inanimate objects. And if using elements of news stories qualifies as plagiarism, either the definition has changed or we're awash in them. Yes, but she missed two important things - 1 - When quoting, she should have cited her sources. That's footnoting, and it's always been valid. 2 - She represended these past events as recent. That's misrepresentation, and has never been valid (except for Pabst beer, which won its blue ribbon in 1893). Her works have been shown to be full of unattributed quotes and misrepresentation. |
View the Top Clips from June 12, 2006
|
||
|
|
|||
|
New from the makers of Clipmarks: Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!
|
|||