I suggest checking the credibility of your sources. When it comes down to it, he's being paid to be a skeptic.

And no one is being paid to promote global warming alarmism? Fact is, there is a lot more money being poured in on the global warming alarmism side of the debate than on the other side.

And there are many things we can do for the environment that would actually help. Instead they want to waste time trying to fight mother nature and control a non-pollutant that is vital to life on Earth. Instead of using that money to help advance poor populations, they are actually stifling their advancement. There is nothing wrong with fighting pollution and trying to reduce the d...

I suggest checking the credibility of your sources. When it comes down to it, he's being paid to be a skeptic.

And no one is being paid to promote global warming alarmism? Fact is, there is a lot more money being poured in on the global warming alarmism side of the debate than on the other side.

And there are many things we can do for the environment that would actually help. Instead they want to waste time trying to fight mother nature and control a non-pollutant that is vital to life on Earth. Instead of using that money to help advance poor populations, they are actually stifling their advancement. There is nothing wrong with fighting pollution and trying to reduce the dependence on oil. There is something wrong with trying to drive economies into the ground in order to reduce the temperature increase by a few hundredths of a degree over the next century.