If her story is true, the 'permanent' teacher should be able to corroborate her testimony, along with the students (although the weight of their testimony might not be exactly credible). It doesn't say whether she immediately seeked assistance from school's IT support people to fix the problem.. if she didn't - that's certainly a strike against her. Also, what level of expertise she has using computers and the Internet, nor what the school policies are in regards to filtering, spyware blocking and pop-up controls.

She certainly could be innocent... or she may not be, it's just too hard to say from the article.

I certainly don't have any problems with popups or see ANY porn on my machin...

If her story is true, the 'permanent' teacher should be able to corroborate her testimony, along with the students (although the weight of their testimony might not be exactly credible). It doesn't say whether she immediately seeked assistance from school's IT support people to fix the problem.. if she didn't - that's certainly a strike against her. Also, what level of expertise she has using computers and the Internet, nor what the school policies are in regards to filtering, spyware blocking and pop-up controls.

She certainly could be innocent... or she may not be, it's just too hard to say from the article.

I certainly don't have any problems with popups or see ANY porn on my machine (and I'm on the net 25 hours a day a lot of times). But I'm an IT guy... but most of my clients have the same scenario on their boxes because of how I configure it for them. Of course if someone intentionally visits inappropriate site and allows software to be installed on their computers - no amount of IT people or protection running on a computer would be sufficient. That's why I'm not sure she's automatically innocent. She very well may not be.