Hi, Fracture

It is definitely interesting article.

I don’t really care about debate between creationists and
evolutionists.

Anyway, most of explanations here are based on materialistic
(mechanicistic) origin. They presuppose that the best way of thinking is not
only scientific skepticism (which is OK for me), but materialistically limited intellectual
auto-censorship.

For me this is about question of informational complexity.
How complex ORGANIZED information in universe can be…? And with organized I
mean INTELLIGENT, too.

Is it possible for me to accept that there are informational
systems in universe so complex and subtle that I can’t comprehend them with my physical
senses or my mi...

Hi, Fracture

It is definitely interesting article.

I don’t really care about debate between creationists and
evolutionists.

Anyway, most of explanations here are based on materialistic
(mechanicistic) origin. They presuppose that the best way of thinking is not
only scientific skepticism (which is OK for me), but materialistically limited intellectual
auto-censorship.

For me this is about question of informational complexity.
How complex ORGANIZED information in universe can be…? And with organized I
mean INTELLIGENT, too.

Is it possible for me to accept that there are informational
systems in universe so complex and subtle that I can’t comprehend them with my physical
senses or my mind (intellect)…?

Materialist will say: the physical curtain you can see and
research is the only one it exists; mystic will say: I think there are more
curtains behind this physical one.

In terms of information: are there more complex and subtle informational
systems behind this 3D system called material world...? How all-embracing can
be these suppositional, hidden informational systems?

Is it possible that when one thing can looks for somebody just
as a stupid superstition, in fact this thing is outcome from some kind of
higher informational level, which is invisible present “behind the curtain” of
our material world?

One concrete example: what if there are some kinds of more
complex and intelligible, but hidden informational patterns behind the patterns
of genes…?

And finally, are these kinds of questions only matter of
faith or maybe matter of mental courage and prestige, too?

OK, I will end now… Thank you for your patience!

Evolution is a fact. Shocking and controversial this might sound,
but bear with me. I'm not talking about Darwin's theory of evolution
by natural selection. I'm talking about the changes in the gene pools
of all species that occur every single day due to births and deaths.
If you accept that most members of a species do not all have the exact
same DNA (which is easily demonstrated), and you accept that sexual
reproduction combines the DNA of two parents to form a slightly different
combination of genes, and you accept that not all creatures survive
long enough to be able to reproduce, then.....

Evolution is a fact. Shocking and controversial this might sound,
but bear with me. I'm not talking about Darwin's theory of evolution
by natural selection. I'm talking about the changes in the gene pools
of all species that occur every single day due to births and deaths.
If you accept that most members of a species do not all have the exact
same DNA (which is easily demonstrated), and you accept that sexual
reproduction combines the DNA of two parents to form a slightly different
combination of genes, and you accept that not all creatures survive
long enough to be able to reproduce, then....

Wow , that is shocking. Especially since this definition and scientific study IS part of ID science. Sounds to me like there is a misunderstanding on the part of evolutionists about what those who profess ID believe.