Article isn't really clear. I would like to know if women responded faster to all the images and if there were any images that men responded faster to. If not then the fact that women respond to erotic images faster is just piggy backing on their ability to understand symbols.

ALSO...the rapid response is not measuring how they are responding psychologically but only the speed at which they are responding. Women are kinda built to weed out or accept potential suitors or sperm donors, in a crude biological way its what we are built for..however if in the end the study is actually suggesting that women get more turned on then men I have a Suggestion: Take every oppurtunity to expose the femal...

Article isn't really clear. I would like to know if women responded faster to all the images and if there were any images that men responded faster to. If not then the fact that women respond to erotic images faster is just piggy backing on their ability to understand symbols.

ALSO...the rapid response is not measuring how they are responding psychologically but only the speed at which they are responding. Women are kinda built to weed out or accept potential suitors or sperm donors, in a crude biological way its what we are built for..however if in the end the study is actually suggesting that women get more turned on then men I have a Suggestion: Take every oppurtunity to expose the female in question to erotic images.

Now the trick or perhaps skill is to do it in a way that allows her to retain her social mask and even more importantly not make you look like a lasivious asshole.

Good luck boys!

Your reaction to this clipping says more about you than the clipping itself says about women. In essence women, in knowing they may become the bearer of children and the protector of them, the voice of reason and guidance, are more alert to apparent danger. On a personal note the ability of my brain to react quickly to the mere display of images, gives me the ability to without a second thought or curiosity of any kind to scroll to the bottom of the "public network " pages and report inappropriate public media.
Where as, the study could have done was to just study the brain's reaction time of men vs women. It is more the perversion of the one who elected this category of images to s...

Your reaction to this clipping says more about you than the clipping itself says about women. In essence women, in knowing they may become the bearer of children and the protector of them, the voice of reason and guidance, are more alert to apparent danger. On a personal note the ability of my brain to react quickly to the mere display of images, gives me the ability to without a second thought or curiosity of any kind to scroll to the bottom of the "public network " pages and report inappropriate public media.
Where as, the study could have done was to just study the brain's reaction time of men vs women. It is more the perversion of the one who elected this category of images to subject this topic to be added at a university study, wwhich should be questioned. And If I had signed up to participate in a university study of the brain's reaction time and somewhere in the middle of the study they threw in pornographic images, then my response would indeed be quicker for those images. The reason would be that I would be trying to alert the attention of the researchers that I no longer wanted to participate in what had become a perverted insult to human research. Nor would I hold any respect from any biased results which come from the particular group of people who did the study. on that topic or any others, Yes I would want the names, so I could file them under "public perverts".

1st you have to consider the source the person who wrote the article latest topic was about the "Proliferation of Lice". We have to disregard things like an overwhelmingly positive response when a study is done at a university. There are too many unknowns. Who did the study? Who did they get for candidates? What keywords did the writer of the article use when they were looking for science topics? Did the Person doing the research ever pass his Thesis defense of the topic? That's right...did they make him go back and start over? These things are not clear because the reference is not easily traceable to the original study. Perhaps the credits are there somewhere, but the topic did no...

1st you have to consider the source the person who wrote the article latest topic was about the "Proliferation of Lice". We have to disregard things like an overwhelmingly positive response when a study is done at a university. There are too many unknowns. Who did the study? Who did they get for candidates? What keywords did the writer of the article use when they were looking for science topics? Did the Person doing the research ever pass his Thesis defense of the topic? That's right...did they make him go back and start over? These things are not clear because the reference is not easily traceable to the original study. Perhaps the credits are there somewhere, but the topic did not present enough sustenance to make me that interested in pursuing the personal research.

There are very many sensory response to stimuli studies involving brain wave mapping. If one really wanted to know about more definitive information, they would start by getting a better source of information. The writer Who is a science editor does indeed bring to the table many areas of science that other wise wouldn't be introduced to people who always start their searches with "erotic images." By starting his entries with such terms, he gives certain audiences something else to think about. Therefore, I do not have any overall complaints for the writer/editors input, because he has brought science to those whose minds stay in the gutter.