Let's challenge this common politically-correct kind of thinking. Is it a "human right" to commit adultery, invade another's marriage, or violate one's own? Even nature avenges itself. It was inconsistent to stone the man and let the woman go free, therefore inequitable, even by their laws.

Consider further that "crimes of passion" are among the leading causes of murder in the United States, where people avenge themselves against adultery as vigilantes, instead of the government punishing the crime and breach of contract. [i]By this evidence we see that by nature people believe adultery should be punished in some way as a crime, violating a personal, emotional and social c...

Let's challenge this common politically-correct kind of thinking. Is it a "human right" to commit adultery, invade another's marriage, or violate one's own? Even nature avenges itself. It was inconsistent to stone the man and let the woman go free, therefore inequitable, even by their laws.

Consider further that "crimes of passion" are among the leading causes of murder in the United States, where people avenge themselves against adultery as vigilantes, instead of the government punishing the crime and breach of contract. By this evidence we see that by nature people believe adultery should be punished in some way as a crime, violating a personal, emotional and social contract. If government punished people would not play vigilante to take matters in their own hands. Therefore failure to punish adulterers perpetuates domestic violence as a consequence.

Ask anyone who had a cheating wife or husband, generally there is hot anger against the party, and to them it was a treacherous act and crime deserving of some form of punishment. Interesting that the marriage contract is breached without retribution when it is perhaps the most personal and binding of all contracts.