Considering that no U.S. citizens travel to these countries when experiencing a life-threatening situation, it’s worth questioning the methods by which the WHO arrived at these rankings. Their criteria included subjective and political assessments such as “Fairness in financial contribution“. Suffice it to say that the WHO’s rankings are clearly fraudulent and are designed to influence U.S. policy.

443,849: The number of British patients of the National Healthcare Service (NHS) who waited four or more weeks for inpatient admittance into a hospital (Excel file) in May of 2009 (more than 75% of all patients).

1,500,000: The number of Canadians who do not have — and cannot find — a general pr...

Considering that no U.S. citizens travel to these countries when experiencing a life-threatening situation, it’s worth questioning the methods by which the WHO arrived at these rankings. Their criteria included subjective and political assessments such as “Fairness in financial contribution“. Suffice it to say that the WHO’s rankings are clearly fraudulent and are designed to influence U.S. policy.

443,849: The number of British patients of the National Healthcare Service (NHS) who waited four or more weeks for inpatient admittance into a hospital (Excel file) in May of 2009 (more than 75% of all patients).

1,500,000: The number of Canadians who do not have — and cannot find — a general practitioner/primary care physician due to shortages in medical staff: “In Norwood, Ontario, 20/20 videotaped a town clerk pulling the names of the lucky winners out of a lottery box.

12,000,000: number of illegal immigrants who would qualify for free health care and — in all likelihood — additional health care rights for relatives under the Democrats’ universal health care plan, according to a reported statement by the office of Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ) and spokespeople for the racial separatist group La Raza.

$311,000,000 ($311 million): The amount of additional funding requested last month by the Obama administration simply to combat Medicare fraud. Medicare fraud is estimated at $60 billion annually.

$3,600,000,000 ($3.6 billion): The amount of added malpractice insurance costs to the current health care system instigated by an out-of-control trial lawyer lobby that donates heavily to Democrat causes.


$10,000,000,000 ($10 billion): The estimated amount of Medicaid fraud, based upon FBI estimates. Criminal practices include billing for nonexistent, overstated, or unnecessary services, kickbacks to patients, inflated costs, etc.


$60,000,000,000 ($60 billion): The estimated annual amount of Medicare fraud, due to widespread criminal operations that victimize taxpayers and specialize in dead doctors, fake patients, non-existent treatments and the like.


$107,000,000,000,000 ($107 trilli...

$3,600,000,000 ($3.6 billion): The amount of added malpractice insurance costs to the current health care system instigated by an out-of-control trial lawyer lobby that donates heavily to Democrat causes.


$10,000,000,000 ($10 billion): The estimated amount of Medicaid fraud, based upon FBI estimates. Criminal practices include billing for nonexistent, overstated, or unnecessary services, kickbacks to patients, inflated costs, etc.


$60,000,000,000 ($60 billion): The estimated annual amount of Medicare fraud, due to widespread criminal operations that victimize taxpayers and specialize in dead doctors, fake patients, non-existent treatments and the like.


$107,000,000,000,000 ($107 trillion): The estimated shortfall of the Medicare and Social Security programs, which are utterly and completely bankrupt; they can be legitimately called an “enormous version of Bernard Madoff’s Ponzi scheme”.

Furthermore, government bureaucrats already raped the Social Security Trust Fund — there is no trust fund.
They raped the Medicare Trust Fund — there’s nothing left. They raped the Highway Trust Fund — it’s empty. I could go down a long list of things the government said it would do, but hasn’t done. Because the big government statists are liars. They even moved these massive expenditures “off the books” to conceal the damage they’ve done.


And now the Democrat Party, the union bosses and the trial lawyers are launching the most massive attack on the American people in the history of government.

They promise health care for everyone, but they will not — and they can’t possibly — deliver it. The numbers don’t lie.

A large number of under 30s choose to not buy insurance.

And a large number of people in their 30s, 40s, 50s, and 60s "choose" to not buy insurance (just as, I suppose, Ian Boynton "chose" to not buy private insurance), and the data show this "choice" is harder for people with lower incomes. [2]

Income % Uncovered
0-25K 37%
25-50K 25%
50-75K 15%
75-100K 9%
100K+ 6%

Also , many in that group would never go without cable, internet, cell phones, parties, etc.

Interesting how you leap blame Americans without health care for causing their woes, without a shred ...

A large number of under 30s choose to not buy insurance.

And a large number of people in their 30s, 40s, 50s, and 60s "choose" to not buy insurance (just as, I suppose, Ian Boynton "chose" to not buy private insurance), and the data show this "choice" is harder for people with lower incomes. [2]

Income % Uncovered
0-25K 37%
25-50K 25%
50-75K 15%
75-100K 9%
100K+ 6%

Also , many in that group would never go without cable, internet, cell phones, parties, etc.

Interesting how you leap blame Americans without health care for causing their woes, without a shred of any kind of data or evidence. But you don't dare entertain the idea when you are talking about Britons whose lack of income makes it harder for them to afford health insurance.

I thinks it is clear to anyone that whatever you believe your facts to be is usually irrelevant and not worth entertaining to any degree. We have shown before that your reputation for "facts" is not highly esteemed. I tend to not waste my time. The difficulty you have with reality absent ideology is directly relational to the insignificance that your "facts" corrspond to reality.

After all, you are a sociologist!
What did the father of Sociology, Ausgust Comte, say about Sociology?
He said this:

Sociology
is not a science. It is a system of strategies
being used to reach a particular goal. What
is that goal?

[i]“the
...

I thinks it is clear to anyone that whatever you believe your facts to be is usually irrelevant and not worth entertaining to any degree. We have shown before that your reputation for "facts" is not highly esteemed. I tend to not waste my time. The difficulty you have with reality absent ideology is directly relational to the insignificance that your "facts" corrspond to reality.

After all, you are a sociologist!
What did the father of Sociology, Ausgust Comte, say about Sociology?
He said this:

Sociology
is not a science. It is a system of strategies
being used to reach a particular goal. What
is that goal?

“the
entire systematisation of human life on the basis of the preponderance
of the heart over the intellect.” You are a propagandist. A practitioner of the art defined by the saying: "Statistics never lie, but liars always use statistics".