righthand says: Female dominated juries fail to convict rapists. Male dominated juries do convict rapists! Why? Law lecturer Conor Hanly, giving his personal assessment of the preliminary results, said the results show this has no grounding in fact. “The most striking result is the fact that not one of the 20 female dominated juries in a six-year period convicted a defendant of rape.The study only looked at convictions of rape and lef... The results conflicted with two similar Irish studies — the Mitchell Committee (1975) and the Law Reform Commission (1987) — which found little difference between the jury types. However, Mr Hanley said the scope of the current project was too confined to say if female dominated juries had become more hostile towards women alleging rape. But then, Ireland has some odd notions about sexuality Like...? I can understand this. Don't know Irish laws, but in the US a man can grab a woman, pull her in an alley, strip her, force her to perform degrading acts and then rape her repeatedly. A guy and a girl can be dating and one night they drink a bit too much and get carried away. At the last moment she says stop; he doesn't. Both are charged with aggravated sexual assault for the simple reason that there was penetration. I could understand it this way. Men see themselves as powerful and and in control. Thus it is their responsibility. To this I would add a jealousy factor to males who would be fearful of their own female loves being violated whereas female jurors do not have this dynamic. Females however realize that most of the time they have more power in male female contact since they are usually the real decider of whether a relationship is even started in the first place. Thus on the theory that you don't usually come to harm unless you place yourself in harms way they would see the female as having a serious responsibility to avoid dangerous situations. (I agree with the female on this and that it ... I would also like to know what odd notions of sex the Irish have. You can tell me because I'm the English Scots side of the tree and we all already know how odd some of the English are.Good one. Your not referring to why they replaced the Scots in the Highland with sheep, are you? They couldn't shag the Scots so they shagged the sheep instead. Ye, they knew they were in trouble when the Irish made a Scottish king also the Irish king. Only thing is you never gave us back our 'water of life' that you acquired from the Irish. Early case of industrial espionage! Ha ha. Dang gang it. I committed the lawyers sin of asking a witness a question when you don't already know the answer. I knew it was risky to mention the Scots when I knew nothing about them really. Ha Ha. Actually I just assumed I was English Irish until I was in my thirties. Never was a big one on genealogical or the national thing myself and as far as sheep, I neither want to be one or chase one! Oh, by the way, in case you misunderstood, I was not saying that the Irish are unusual in the sex department. I would assume that they would claim to be the best lovers in the world like any other group. |
View the Top Clips from March 29, 2008
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|