 n2sooners says: And it just keeps coming. Cherry-picking again. Did you read the letter, sooners? Four pages of the realities of being a Palestinian in occupied land. One sentence about an "ethnic bomb". I've personally never heard of such a thing, but hey, I'm sitting at a computer, so I googled it. Israel is developing a biological `ethnic bomb' that kills Arabs, but leaves Jews unharmed. So claimed the respected London Sunday Times on 15 November, citing Israeli military and western intelligence sources. South Africa's Truth Commission revealed the apartheid government conducted extensive efforts in mid 1980 to produce a `pigmentation' bio-weapon that would kill blacks, but not whites. South Africa's... And another thing: criticizing Israel does not make one an anti-Semite. They never let facts get in the way. N2sooners, I am more concerned about the violence and terrorism this ideological religion poses here in the US. It seems to me this radical theology is grounded in much that supports violence and terror here at home. This is evidence of the world-view this theology encourages. Really? I'll have the feds run a pigmentation check on the last few hundred perpetrators of school and church attacks and bombings in the U.S. Maybe McVeigh special racial-camo paint will finally flake off. Never mind, he ain't around for that, although I think they can do wonders these days with using forensics postmortem. Well ratilfar, thanks for the proper scolding. Now we know that the 911 attacks were not important because you are going to play a silly numbers game! Excuse me? Talk about jumping the cliff to reach a conclusion that I did not make. Unless your saying that the Suffi/Sunni al-Qaeda agents some how connect to Obama's church because the church sent a mailer that was pro-Palestinian and that drove them angry enough to...wait no...it encourage them to kill themselves and murder thousands of others. Not a numbers game, a reality game, if you want to look at dangerous and extremist philosophies, ones that actually generated people willing to commit mass murder of innocents, your looking in the wrong place and tarring a lot of folks with a very wide brush. Was that your intent? And the clip is misleading, as was a previous clip making a conn... @ratilfar What you said about pigmentation was an attack on Whites and that attack had nothing to do with the church except as a ploy by you to distract from the churches possible sins by saying that hundreds of Whites have done it; attack churches and schools. Something that I'm not aware of myself. And it's more than a little disingenuous to pin McVeigh as a White sinner when it was also Whites that executed him. And it was Whites he attacked. Meaning that to refer to his Whiteness is at worst racism and at best a claim that Whites do it so it's not bad if Blacks do it. not a very responsible argument. Your right, it is disingenuous, although I did not make the claim that is not as bad if one side does it if the other side does it as well. Its equally bad who ever does it. And I see no proof that in this case those who are accused of being racist or anti-Semitic are in fact either of these things. Nor did I make so absurd connection to the events of September 11. I stand corrected. Thanks. I think ideas come from dialog, not that change happens often or is always fun topursue but one must keep trying!  That said I have to take your side on this clip ratilfar (perhaps not for all the same reasons) But the newsletter is 100% right on and true so far as I know! Furthermore the line about an ethnic bomb is stretching but not very much I think. In fact I could swear that within the last month and a half I saw news articles about the USA having been contemplating this very thing against the Arabs. In any case we know Israelis murder the Palestinians on a nearly daily basis and have been stealing their land for over 60 years so who would have the slightest doubt that they would do such a thing if they could? |
View the Top Clips from March 25, 2008
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
|
|
|
