maquser says: Seriously man. Hamas and Hezbollah are totally evil terror groups & should be elimated. Should I waste my time replying to this? — Comment removed by clipper — what the fuck dude. If the terrorist fought by the 'rules' then the British Empire would still rule the earth including America. How many head to head battles did the Brits lose? (Where would you be now without the French fleet.) So you got rid of a sovereign and replaced him with your own elite - the new nobles - and still with you. Ireland major use of guerilla war was the next major jump forward of dealing with a large standing army. Michael Collins 'took out' ALL the intelligence agents in one morning. The Brits responded that day by entering Croke Park during a football match and killing randomly - the original Bloody Sunday. Prior to that event the Irish majority had been prepared to accept whatever the... No 'Hearths and Minds', is what lost you the Vietnam War. Make martyrs of your opponents and you lose. Bobby Sands' martyrs death turned the whole of Ireland in support but his death commenced the road to a political solution. Torture and 'Shoot to Kill' had to stop before their was progress. The point is that however you classify the insurrectionist, the state must not become terrorists. Indiscriminate killing of women and children in retaliation for a random aimed rocket will ensure more and more support for Hamas. Even the Zionists must know this! Source: Gisha; Human Rights Watch (HRW); Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) Date: 13 May 2008 Human Rights Watch, Gisha, and Physicians for Human Rights—Israel unreservedly condemn the Palestinian rocket and other attacks against Israeli civilians, such as the mortar attack that killed a civilian in Kfar Aza on May 9, which violate the international legal prohibition against attacks that deliberately target or indiscriminately harm civilians. However, unlawful attacks by one side to a conflict do not permit unlawful actions – in this case collective punishment – by the other. As the occupying pow... The point being, that as quoted, [b"]the state must not become terrorists"[/b] no matter how you judge what is a terrorist from your point of view. "However, unlawful attacks by one side to a conflict do not permit unlawful actions – in this case collective punishment – by the other." Could it be clearer. One man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter, or else we would still be cow-towing the a British monarch! Lastly would you automatically accept any judgement by Bush&Co on any matter. After all the lies and deception might you not consider that he's wrong yet again. |
View the Top Clips from May 14, 2008
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
|
|
|