. . . Beyond that, the run was apparently primarily among institutional investors, and primarily aimed at money market mutual funds, which means the total market size was only about $2.2 trillion, less than half the size of the loss Kanjorski reported.

Salon.com notes the discrepancy, and notes as well that Rep. Kanjorski is one of the Democrats from the House who voted against the House’s version of the recent stimulus bill.

Meanwhile, Sweetness and Light actually believes the run on the banks was the result of a Democratic plot, and asks “Does anyone know what Mr. Soros was doing that day?”

[url=http://sweetness-light.com/archive/550b-lost-in-electronic-run-on-banks]$550B Lost In Ele...

. . . Beyond that, the run was apparently primarily among institutional investors, and primarily aimed at money market mutual funds, which means the total market size was only about $2.2 trillion, less than half the size of the loss Kanjorski reported.

Salon.com notes the discrepancy, and notes as well that Rep. Kanjorski is one of the Democrats from the House who voted against the House’s version of the recent stimulus bill.

Meanwhile, Sweetness and Light actually believes the run on the banks was the result of a Democratic plot, and asks “Does anyone know what Mr. Soros was doing that day?”

$550B Lost In Electronic Run On Banks Sweetness & Light

Several very interesting comments on the George
Soros angle. (and globalist buddy of algore, Maurice
Strong, Canadian fugitive, currently living in China)

proreason says:
February 10, 2009 at 12:58 pm

BannedbytheTaliban says:
February 10, 2009 at 1:13 pm

retire05 says:
February 10, 2009 at 10:34 pm

sheehanjihad says:
February 11, 2009 at 11:00 am

proreason says:
February 11, 2009 at 6:38 pm

. . .And why isn’t our transparent government and watchdog press telling the American people what happened that day when the financial system shut down? Kanjorski flat-out states that the entire global financial system could have come crashing down. It was an event even more important than 9/11. 9/11, horrible as it was, had no chance of ending civilization as we know it. But according to Kanjorski, Sept 18 2008 might indeed have ended civilization.

Yet we know nothing of the events of that day.

Why is that?