Americans who are confused by the grotesque transformation of the modest aim of capturing a few bad men into a conflagration that has destroyed the lives of millions echo the Guardian of the 1920s, which asked why the British government had to send "all this machinery, all these forces...if we were establishing a political system on the basis of popular consent?"
Without distinguishing between drones that protect our troops and those that drop bombs and hover menacingly over an occupied people, The Economist taunts, "like them or not, drones are here to stay."

Now, who are the terrorists here and which is the rogue state ?

LOL you've been watching too many Terminator movies or you're just dumb as a brick.

POPped for making me laugh though.

Beanz, beanz the musical fruit
The more you eat the more you toot.
The more you eat, the better you feel
So eat your beanz with every meal.

Right on beanz. File this under fart/flatulence humor.

http://blog.puppetgov.com/2009/10/31/are-drone-attacks-terrorism-hillary-clinton-no/

From the link:
'Are Drone Attacks Terrorism? Hillary Clinton: No'

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton came face-to-face Friday with Pakistani anger over U.S. aerial drone attacks in tribal areas along the Afghan border...

Of course it is: by what right do the US do this to people in foreign countries ?

Clipontie - too subtle for me mate, what are you talking about ?