Here's the rest of the story:

Local party officials immediately climbed out of the muck to repudiate the piece and apologize, right?

Not exactly.

In a news release, the party disavowed the Hitler comparison but acknowledged that it had sent the piece out, in its entirety, because it was interesting and "might incite conversation."

However, the release went on, "This sort of inflammatory language is neither condoned nor encouraged by our party."

Except, that is, when this sort of inflammatory language is, in fact, condoned, encouraged and even distributed by the party.

And they're calling him dishonest.

Anyone who claims a major hurdle for Obama is his race is either lying to himself or lying to others.