The true reason why the united nations was established.

...and why it must be disestablished.

Oooh scary....

Ratilfar--

I'm not sure if your comment is in reply to mine, but I certainly didn't mean mine to be scary. A simple vote of the U.S. Congress not to send money would pretty much end the whole charade. It need not be anything scary.

But it needs to be done rather soon. These people are starting to think they are really legitimate and important. They've never been to a Homeowner's Association meeting!

I meant it about the whole clip, its ridiculous, especially considering that one of the founding nations of the UN is the US and is one of 5 nations that sits on the Security Council with full veto power. The whole "UN" world goverment thing is a sham, a way to hide fears about the US loss of power in the world, dreading the day it can no longer call its self a superpower. The UN can not do anything without the consent of its members, if it had that much power the world would be a very different place (whether that would be good or bad is a different story).

So I reiterate....ooooohhh scary!

Thanks for your comments.

Ratilfar, If you have not done so, I highly recommend that you read two books by Carrol Quigley. Namely,
The Anglo-American Establishment and
Tragedy and Hope.

This past CFR historian (www.cfr.org) lays this all out for you to read.

Dry books but well worth the read.

Check this out:

Under the U.S. Constitution, once a treaty is ratified by the Senate, its provisions supersede all other laws—federal, state, and local. Article VI, Section 2 of the Constitution clearly states that “all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land.”

I'd imagine its the same for other constitutional republics too.

Source:
http://www.fee.org/publications/the-freeman/article.asp?aid=3536

There is a strong line of opinion, however, that a treaty which itself violates the provisions of the Constitution cannot supercede it. Just as Congress cannot pass an unconstitutional law, the Senate cannot ratify an unconstitutional treaty, goes the reasoning. The Senate could not ratify a treaty making Kofi Anan our king, for instance.