Clipmarks
   
  
   
willhelmfollowshare
6-18-2008 7:27 PM319 views
willhelm says:
I figured the ink for my Epson photo printer at $13,000 per gallon.
9 Comments   | Add a Comment
6-18-2008 10:33 PM
burndata0
These comparisons are stupid. Does anyone (other than the US congress) need to use 15 gallons of printer ink a week?
6-19-2008 12:13 AM
willhelm
By your logic, water should cost more than gasoline.
6-19-2008 3:30 AM
jmjoness
I don't see how this is an illogical comparison lol... This is pretty rediculous. Personally I usually just by a new cheap printer, it's cheaper!!
6-19-2008 10:37 AM
jamesgrimes
Its crazy when its cheaper to buy a new printer than it is to buy replacement ink cartridges. Something is going on there that I don't like. Fishy!
6-22-2008 1:50 AM
jetcloud
Ya, but how many pictures do you get?
6-22-2008 1:51 AM
jetcloud
per gallon
6-22-2008 2:47 AM
jmjoness
pictures... I don't think that has anything to do with the price, ink certainly does not normally cost this much, it's monopolistic manipulation.
6-22-2008 7:03 AM
LoPhatt
Oh come on, it's a free market, competition and all determines prices. Design managers puts a lock on ink usage options requiring the use of their very special ink and requiring you to stay hooked up like a junky and you don't like it, thats all. It's not so bad. Soon you will see someone will have developed the same hook on clean water. I just love madness with a method. Do you think we could put a hook on the air too?
6-22-2008 7:36 AM
jmjoness
I'll assume you're being sarcastic... If that the case then I certainly agree. We'll probably be begging big buisness for the right to exist before too long.
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up





Embed This Clip In Your Site...


OK