Mind you, folks have the right to protest whatever they want, and I find Obama's neo-liberal policies will in the long run make things worse, not better (Sarkozy, yeah the conservative French President, called for more regs).

But me thinks the people behind this are in fact duping others by protesting FOR the people that picked America's (and the world) pocket. I mean Rick Santelli is not on your side. He is on the bankers side for God's sake!

Obamanomics? That was in the last photo, I think. Reganomics. Anyone remember that phrase? This president hasn't been in office long enough to have a "omics'' added to his name. My favorite idiotic term is "Obamabots". I vote that one in for, "#1 stupid thing to call a Democrat when you know they've won a debate". Wellll, then we've got, "the Messiah" "the One" and recently I heard "The Destroyer", another term for Satan. Sooo, obviously we aren't talking about English professors here.

No we are not.

Funny, but just a few short months ago the MSM could give wall to wall coverage to a few much smaller protests which were usually organized and funded by one single group and no one asked this question.

Yes, and what where these protests? Where and what where they protesting about?

While they're having their little tea party, either we can set them adrift or perhaps they'll let the Obama administration get on with resolving the problems bequeathed to him from Bush/Cheney.

Really, what good are they doing by this. None and they know it. I really feel that most of them just can't stand having a man of color as President of this country. If it weren't sour grapes or racist idiocies, then it would be an alternative they would present, not tea.

Ah yes, that must be it. They are just worried about the man being black and care nothing about him being incompetent.

Proof would be nice, especially when they really go nothing to show for it.