it's all in the spin ratifar......and all i see from the right is a big whirrr-zip-spin- they think they have it all sewn up- hate and b.s. in a neat little set of talking points- they are forgetting one thing- there are plenty of folks out here that have been out thinking them for quite some time now- too bad they couldn't just kindly move out of the way- let some progress happen.....instead of vowing to impede anything that even smells like a good idea or solution to the crap they have given and left this country with........who knows- whilst standing back and out of the way- watching how to make things better? they might actually learn something- oooops my bad- not in their game plan- tha...

it's all in the spin ratifar......and all i see from the right is a big whirrr-zip-spin- they think they have it all sewn up- hate and b.s. in a neat little set of talking points- they are forgetting one thing- there are plenty of folks out here that have been out thinking them for quite some time now- too bad they couldn't just kindly move out of the way- let some progress happen.....instead of vowing to impede anything that even smells like a good idea or solution to the crap they have given and left this country with........who knows- whilst standing back and out of the way- watching how to make things better? they might actually learn something- oooops my bad- not in their game plan- that learning thing? lol - requires more than the ability to spew- spew.....

Thanks for the link. From reading it, I'm guessing that the "bowing" and the handshake and the unspecified acts of appeasement are the punishment.

Gingrich seems unable to tell the difference between "engagement" and "appeasement". A country can talk to another country and try to negotiate their differences or they can go to war, kill a lot of people, destroy a lot of property and shatter spirits on both sides, then negotiate a peace treaty. Either way, they end up at the conference table. Isn't it better to skip the war and just go to the table first?

Of course, the war usually boosts the winner's economy and industry and has the added benefit of population control. That's very good ...

Thanks for the link. From reading it, I'm guessing that the "bowing" and the handshake and the unspecified acts of appeasement are the punishment.

Gingrich seems unable to tell the difference between "engagement" and "appeasement". A country can talk to another country and try to negotiate their differences or they can go to war, kill a lot of people, destroy a lot of property and shatter spirits on both sides, then negotiate a peace treaty. Either way, they end up at the conference table. Isn't it better to skip the war and just go to the table first?

Of course, the war usually boosts the winner's economy and industry and has the added benefit of population control. That's very good for the people sho sit at home and invest in war profiteering. He comes from a military family, but he never served himself. If he runs for president, I'd vote for George Leroy Tirebiter before I'd vote for Newton Leroy Gingrich.