"Think for yourself. Iran has no nuclear weapons, and its military is designed for defence. It has no offensive capability – no air force, no navy to speak of. Israel, on the other hand, is usually ranked as the fifth most powerful military state on the planet. It has more than 200 nuclear weapons and a superb air force.

"Iran has said it has no desire to attack Israel or any other country. It has said its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes and that it has no desire for a nuclear weapon. The head cleric has issued a fatwa against nuclear weapons. And there is [u]not one shred of evidence that I...

"Think for yourself. Iran has no nuclear weapons, and its military is designed for defence. It has no offensive capability – no air force, no navy to speak of. Israel, on the other hand, is usually ranked as the fifth most powerful military state on the planet. It has more than 200 nuclear weapons and a superb air force.

"Iran has said it has no desire to attack Israel or any other country. It has said its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes and that it has no desire for a nuclear weapon. The head cleric has issued a fatwa against nuclear weapons. And there is not one shred of evidence that Iran is pursuing a nuclear weapon.

"Just remember the lies told to you before Iraq:
that Saddam Hussein was pursuing a nuclear weapon;
that he had enormous stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons.
The only thing he really had was oil.
That's why we went to war, and that's why the administration wants to go to war with Iran."

Trumped
Lies

Wrong answer again. Poagmahone!

Proof of cooperation between Iran and Syria in the development and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was brought to light Monday in a Jane's Magazine report that dozens of Iranian engineers and 15 Syrian officers were killed in a July 23 accident in Syria.

Syrian and Iranian Presidents, Bashar Assad, and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, listen to national anthems at the Ash-Shaeb presidential palace in Damascus, Thursday.
Photo: AP

RELATED

Analysis: There's a reason world is quiet on alleged IAF strike
J'lem downplays Iranian threat; Olmert: I respect Assad
According to the report, cited by Channel 10, the joint Syrian-Iranian team was attempt...

Wrong answer again. Poagmahone!

Proof of cooperation between Iran and Syria in the development and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was brought to light Monday in a Jane's Magazine report that dozens of Iranian engineers and 15 Syrian officers were killed in a July 23 accident in Syria.

Syrian and Iranian Presidents, Bashar Assad, and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, listen to national anthems at the Ash-Shaeb presidential palace in Damascus, Thursday.
Photo: AP

RELATED

Analysis: There's a reason world is quiet on alleged IAF strike
J'lem downplays Iranian threat; Olmert: I respect Assad
According to the report, cited by Channel 10, the joint Syrian-Iranian team was attempting to mount a chemical warhead on a scud missile when the explosion occurred, spreading lethal chemical agents, including sarin nerve gas and VX gas.
The factory was created specifically for the purposes of altering ballistic missiles to carry chemical payloads, the magazine report claimed.
Reports of the accident were circulated at the time, however, no details were released by the Syrian government, and there were no hints of an Iranian connection.
The report comes on the heels of criticism leveled by the Syrains at the United States, accusing it of spreading "false" claims of Syrian nuclear activity and cooperation with North Korea to excuse an alleged Israeli air incursion over the country this month.
According to Global Security.org, Syria is not a signatory of either the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), - an international agreement banning the production, stockpiling or use of chemical weapons, or the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT).
Syria began developing chemical weapons in 1973, just before the Yom Kippur War. Global Security.org cites the country as having one of the most advanced chemical weapons programs in the Middle East.

"Just remember the lies told to you before Iraq: that Saddam Hussein was pursuing a nuclear weapon; that he had enormous stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons. The only thing he really had was oil. That's why we went to war, and that's why the administration wants to go to war with Iran.

"I've heard some politicians say that Ahmadinejad has "blood on his hands." Well, our $40 billion worth of intelligence cannot even determine if he was involved in the taking of the American embassy back in 1979. As for blood, American politicians have far more Iranian blood on their hands.
We overthrew Iran's democratic government and
installed the Shah a...

"Just remember the lies told to you before Iraq: that Saddam Hussein was pursuing a nuclear weapon; that he had enormous stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons. The only thing he really had was oil. That's why we went to war, and that's why the administration wants to go to war with Iran.

"I've heard some politicians say that Ahmadinejad has "blood on his hands." Well, our $40 billion worth of intelligence cannot even determine if he was involved in the taking of the American embassy back in 1979. As for blood, American politicians have far more Iranian blood on their hands.
We overthrew Iran's democratic government and
installed the Shah and his secret police.
We sided with and assisted Saddam Hussein when he invaded Iran.
Tens of thousands of Iranians are dead because of America's foreign policy.

"We truly have a corrupt and incompetent government in Washington."

...who are the proven liars?
LIES, LIES, and More LIES. LIES from Bush, LIES from...

TRUMPED

how many more dead USA young people do you want?

"I was this" , "I was that" , "I'm a professional something or other". "You're a republican plant" ( I haven't seen 'paid shill', yet--I'm sure its coming) , You idiots seem to consider the website to be yours and disagree'ers are just "here" to do this or that to you. Well, Americablog, CrooksandLiars,and the rest are custom made for you scumbags.
I don't know if the owners of this site has recruited you assholes here to make it more familiar to them(I recognize their names from those sites) but there was a time HERE-- before you came-- that things were civil and there was a fairly balanced level to people's 'take' on things. And this infantile, tried-n-true template of intimidation, person...

"I was this" , "I was that" , "I'm a professional something or other". "You're a republican plant" ( I haven't seen 'paid shill', yet--I'm sure its coming) , You idiots seem to consider the website to be yours and disagree'ers are just "here" to do this or that to you. Well, Americablog, CrooksandLiars,and the rest are custom made for you scumbags.
I don't know if the owners of this site has recruited you assholes here to make it more familiar to them(I recognize their names from those sites) but there was a time HERE-- before you came-- that things were civil and there was a fairly balanced level to people's 'take' on things. And this infantile, tried-n-true template of intimidation, personal attack, and pompous,cocksure self-importance was the realm of those other places. This was a refuge from that bullshit, and from small idiots like you guys.
I don't know why you follow me righthand. Do you just follow everybody and they just follow back? Is that what's up with the 400 followers? What separates you from the politicians? Numbers are your goal but you're just a prick. As a matter of fact, you can get off my trail anytime.

Following 4432 ?
Dude, you're misguided.
I think Clipmarks has jumped the shark.
Capitulation may be beginning among the intelligent.

Davboz-

Yes, you hit the nail on the head. If you noticed, Righthand is the only person here that instantly adds every new clipper to 'his clippers list'. I also noticed when he first did this a large majority of the people who were added chose NOT to follow him 'back'. Says alot there. ANd yes you are seeing overflow and scum trails from those other sites you mentioned here I'm sure.

As for my purpose here, I am one of the original inventors of the technology that made this site possible. If you want to read through my ...

Following 4432 ?
Dude, you're misguided.
I think Clipmarks has jumped the shark.
Capitulation may be beginning among the intelligent.

Davboz-

Yes, you hit the nail on the head. If you noticed, Righthand is the only person here that instantly adds every new clipper to 'his clippers list'. I also noticed when he first did this a large majority of the people who were added chose NOT to follow him 'back'. Says alot there. ANd yes you are seeing overflow and scum trails from those other sites you mentioned here I'm sure.

As for my purpose here, I am one of the original inventors of the technology that made this site possible. If you want to read through my comments, you'll find the references.(my name is on the patent applications). So I do have a vested interest here, among other things. My apologies that this site has 'jumped the shark' as well, that's what happens when people don't plan ahead for the best or worst that can happen. The gig is almost up on Righthand, rest assured. I am contacting the people at Forbes (the proposed buyers of this site) to let them know the things they better look into real quick.

So why doesn't clipmark censor us? You’re the inventor of it.

This is the same fact-jumping you see at the blogs this site is starting to resemble. And at Media Matters.

The original point was this:=

one of the original inventors of the technology that made this site possible.

So in retort it was implied directly that it had meant:=

clipmark -- You’re the inventor of it.

This is the same caca that allows the top of a thread at Huff. Post ,C & L,and such (more & more here) to proclaim,...."oh such & such is screwed,they're bastard thieves, stole our rights this time, pervert,hypocrite" .-..followed by .-..."IF TRUE".
This post, then, has allowed fo...

So why doesn't clipmark censor us? You’re the inventor of it.

This is the same fact-jumping you see at the blogs this site is starting to resemble. And at Media Matters.

The original point was this:=

one of the original inventors of the technology that made this site possible.

So in retort it was implied directly that it had meant:=

clipmark -- You’re the inventor of it.

This is the same caca that allows the top of a thread at Huff. Post ,C & L,and such (more & more here) to proclaim,...."oh such & such is screwed,they're bastard thieves, stole our rights this time, pervert,hypocrite" .-..followed by .-..."IF TRUE".
This post, then, has allowed for the requisite leeway for the whole string of dozens of filthy, crude haters to go on the assumption that it IS true. Somehow this makes sense to the ...WOW! It all makes sense to me now. That study (highly dubious) they just did that they molded to say the liberal mind is more adaptive to change is likely indicitave of how easily they can jump from something being close,near, or similar and in their mind,to making it "true". All so easy in the adaptibility of the liberal brain.Yup. Makes sense to ME