Clipmarks
Antarafollowshare
6-3-2009 5:21 PM
304 views
11 Comments   | Add a Comment
6-3-2009 6:51 PM
4ensic
Evil GM provided a fine living for hundreds of thousands of workers over the years.

How many people are on Saint Moore's payroll?
6-4-2009 2:27 AM
Oortcloud
He's absolutely right. GM should have been left to die on its own.

Give me a break. You'll defend this tripe with "they provide a payroll"?! So does welfare, yet republicans predominately bitch about that, but giving welfare to corporations is OK?

Like I said, give me a break.
6-4-2009 3:26 AM
Antara
Micheal Moore is a shithead.

Nuff said.
6-4-2009 3:28 AM
Antara
btw: save your preening lectures OOrt, as I am fairly sure no one here wanted bailouts for GM in the first place.
6-4-2009 9:53 AM
dl211
Anyone who can even remotely defend someone as rotten as Moore is no one to be taken seriously.

You give a billion dollars of welfare to those that do not work - what's the return? what's the incentive to work? - nothing. You will only get the same outstreched hands again and again.

You give business a billion dollar tax break - what's the return - more jobs - more revenues for government.

Instead of moronic lawyers running the country - we need someone with just a smidgen of business savy.

Only an idiot would equate tax breaks to businesses with welfare. Business uses tax breaks to grow, with that growth comes more jobs, with more jobs the government actually receives more ...
6-4-2009 10:37 AM
Oortcloud
I see then. All your moaning and groaning about spending and welfare doesn't count when its done on something you agree with.

I guess we aren't talking integrity here, just cutting off noses to spite the face because Moor's name was dropped?

dl, you give a billion dollars to a company that is failing and can't produce a product with any improvements - what's the return? More of the same shit being offered to consumers. What's the incentive to improve the product? - nothing. You'll get the same outstretched hand over and over.

however the vast majority of it simply rewards lazy bums to sit on their asses
With humanity like that who needs global catastrophies?

save y...
6-4-2009 12:01 PM
dl211
dl, you give a billion dollars to a company that is failing and can't produce a product with any improvements - what's the return?
The answer is simple - you do not give failing businesses 'welfare' - let them die the death they deserve.

Tax incentives would not have helped GM, the government taking them over after spending billions of dollars on them did not prevent the bankrupcy. Now that Obama is the CEO of Obama Motors - it only means the taxpayers will supply any funds to keep it going on life support. GM has simply become another welfare recipient on a massive scale. Somehow it seems you think I was OK with shit-for-brains bailing GM out, not a chance. Neith...
6-4-2009 3:09 PM
clip-on-tie
Michael Moore-on is not "filled with joy" because he wasn't satisfied with their products and services. When Michael isn't trying to fill a quota of denouncing every major corporation with the exception of Krispy Kreme and Domino's Pizza, he's railing on the evils of the same corporations in which he owns shares, and buying up the products they produce faster than Rosie O' Donnell can eat a puff pastry. But both of them are obese because corporations make spoons and forks.

Moore isn't filled with anything other than bullshit and trans-fat. Oortcloud is standing on a three-legged stool of tourettes and faulty reasoning. You'd have better luck holding your family hostage and spewing that claptrap with impunity.
6-4-2009 4:48 PM
Antara
Oort definitely seems confused....and frankly, with comments like the following:

"I'm only pointing out how retarded you people are "

and

"I'm starting to think you people just bitch to fill a quota"


I am not really interested in anything he has to say anymore.

6-5-2009 5:23 AM
StillOortcloud
I guess I was wrong. You aren't bitching to fill a quota, you are bitching to just hear yourself blabber.

No need to block me from commenting, Antara. I'll show myself out. It's obvious that you sunk into the depths of party line discussions with glaring logical fallacies that you eagerly ignore. Perhaps one day you'll get back to the fully intellectual person who's clips interested me, but for the moment my comment stands. The argument presented here is retarded, as in stunted, stalled, and intellectually stunted.
6-5-2009 3:09 PM
Antara
lol, i admire your perseverance OOrt!!!Way to get that last word in!

Truth is, I used to enjoy your comments/clips, but I have noticed a real slide in your level of discourse this year (puzzling since with the election victory of THE ONE you think you might have cheered up a tad????) I guess after Obama mocking the special olympics during his *barf* Leno appearance, you are just following suit.....monkey see, monkey do??

and btw- I would have returned the "retarded" label right back at you, except that would be a massive insult to "retarded" people (some of whom I actually know!) They ALL show a lot more class than you.

Adios.
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up
Embed This Clip In Your Site...

New from the makers of Clipmarks:  Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!

OK