Clipmarks
arifsalifollowshare
7-24-2006 10:47 AM
541 views
4 Comments   | Add a Comment
7-24-2006 8:40 PM
rmowery
The only think I feel bad about with this article is Steven Hawking spent time writing this and the intednded receipent, King Bush will have difficulty comprehending it.

I guess that is a problem in society, when a man with an incredible brain, tries to explain something to a man with a very little used brain. Steven should have relayed this to one of the signing gorrilas, who could have then provided it in King Bush's language.

7-24-2006 9:28 PM
arifsali
naaa....he has to be the smartest guy on earth because he's the president of usa.
7-25-2006 2:33 PM
svenllr
Interesting how a four-day-old embryo isn't considered living yet evolutionists, such as Hawking's, feel the single-cell paramecia is a living cell that started the biological race to human kind. Wow, what reversed thinking for the "smartest man" in the world.

How is sacrificing life for others any different then what the Nazi's did? They were labeled barbaric yet Bush is penned stupid. No, I feel it is society that has become deficient as they can not see the darkness in their own morality. Sad.
7-25-2006 2:38 PM
gwydas
It's like he said though, it's not like they're taking something that wasn't already doomed. Why not make it usable? Living on in something/someone else? For the betterment of all. I had a friend once to had a baby boy. He died at 2 weeks old. She gave his clothes away to charity, and his formula to other babies to needed it. If an embryo is going to die already at 4 days in the womb, should it not do it's best to help someone else?
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up
New from the makers of Clipmarks:  Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!

OK