I don't see any countries here I envy or want to emigrate to. They have a multitude of problems and conflicts, hardly examples of Utopia,...

There's a big difference between the "organic" -- that is, countries that evolved that way by choice -- and atheistic countries that were forced into it! [from previous clip explaining the difference].

Here's the explanation:

Atheism and Societal Health

Indeed, countries containing high percentages of non-believers are among the most healthy and wealthy nations on earth (Paul, 2004).

Of course, we must always distinguish between those nations where non-belief has been force...

I don't see any countries here I envy or want to emigrate to. They have a multitude of problems and conflicts, hardly examples of Utopia,...

There's a big difference between the "organic" -- that is, countries that evolved that way by choice -- and atheistic countries that were forced into it! [from previous clip explaining the difference].

Here's the explanation:

Atheism and Societal Health

Indeed, countries containing high percentages of non-believers are among the most healthy and wealthy nations on earth (Paul, 2004).

Of course, we must always distinguish between those nations where non-belief has been forced upon the society by dictators (“coercive atheism”) from those societies wherein non-belief has emerged on its own without governmental coercion (“organic atheism”).

Nations marked by coercive atheism -- such as China, North Korea, Vietnam, and former Soviet states -- are societies marked by all that comes with totalitarianism: poor economic development, intellectual censorship, widespread corruption, ubiquitous depression, etc..

However, nations marked by high levels of organic atheism – such as Sweden, the Netherlands, and France -- are among the healthiest, wealthiest, most educated, and most free societies on earth.