Here’s Alan Dershowitz at the Christian Science Monitor:

Equally unsurprising is the response of the United Nations, the European Union, Russia, and others who, at least when it comes to Israel, see a moral and legal equivalence between terrorists who target civilians and a democracy that responds by targeting the terrorists.

And finally, there is the United States and a few other nations that place the blame squarely on Hamas for its unlawful and immoral policy of using its own civilians as human shields, behind whom they fire rockets at Israeli civilians.

The most dangerous of the three responses is not the Iranian-Hamas abs...

Here’s Alan Dershowitz at the Christian Science Monitor:

Equally unsurprising is the response of the United Nations, the European Union, Russia, and others who, at least when it comes to Israel, see a moral and legal equivalence between terrorists who target civilians and a democracy that responds by targeting the terrorists.

And finally, there is the United States and a few other nations that place the blame squarely on Hamas for its unlawful and immoral policy of using its own civilians as human shields, behind whom they fire rockets at Israeli civilians.

The most dangerous of the three responses is not the Iranian-Hamas absurdity, which is largely ignored by thinking and moral people, but the United Nations and European Union response, which equates the willful murder of civilians with legitimate self-defense pursuant to Article 51 of the United Nations Charter.

Yeah, but most thinking and moral people long since stopped
thinking the UN and the EU are either thinking or moral. That’s the
disturbing part … how few thinking, moral people there seem to be in
the world. It’s like French humanitarianism. An
oxymoronic contradiction in terms when the unwillingness to kill
terrorists and the eagerness to negotiate with them only leaves
terrorists in control, and prolongs the suffering of the people who are
supposed to benefit from the theoretically humanitary disengagement.