Clipmarks
merriefollowshare
8-29-2009 7:03 AM
119 views
merrie says:
Americans could be forgiven for believing, on the basis of shamefully twisted mainstream media coverage, that the recently revealed 2004 CIA Inspector-General report at the center of this controversy is merely a cataloging of CIA abuse.

But in fact, the report methodically described a carefully limited and, with a few exceptions, faithfully implemented program of enhanced interrogation techniques - techniques that yielded what the report itself deems valuable results.

The report also details the exceptions, cases in which interrogation techniques were used that were outside the carefully developed regime.

But here is the crucial fact for Holder: All of the allegations of unauthorized methods - all of them - have already been carefully evaluated by career prosecutors. These were legal officials who, unlike Holder, do not owe their jobs to any partisan political figure.

Impartial prosecutors evaluated 20 incidents of unauthorized activity and decided against taking legal
3 Comments   | Add a Comment
8-29-2009 7:04 AM
merrie
. . . activity and decided against taking legal action in all cases but one. In that one case, in which a contract employee attacked a terrorist detainee with a metal flashlight, the contractor was found guilty. His case was appealed and his conviction upheld.

In other words, justice was done.

But apparently for Holder, justice under a Republican administration doesn’t mean the same thing as justice under a Democratic administration.

On the day the report was released, CIA Director Leon Panetta - himself an Obama appointee - protested that the CIA received “multiple written assurances its methods were lawful.”

The report reveals that the men and women of the CIA not only worked diligent...
8-29-2009 7:05 AM
merrie
Instead, the president is silent on Martha’s Vineyard, and his surrogates are blaming the political prosecutions of CIA officials on the Attorney General.

Even if you believe this convenient division of political culpability, the Attorney General has failed to honor the law. He has given into - or faithfully carried out - the revenge fantasies of the anti-American left.

If Obama won’t uphold his fundamental duty as Commander-in-Chief to defend those who have been defending America, the least he can do is insist that his Attorney General uphold his fundamental duty to defend the rule of law.

If Holder and his senior team won’t do the right thing and resign their positions, Obama should do ...
8-29-2009 9:36 AM
disenchantedcitizen
There will be no danger of special prosecutors rationalizing their existence this time. The American people already have a long list of prime targets for investigation.

I do not deny that those who participated in torture did what they thought they had to do to protect this country, but their methods were outside of the law and as such the Attorney General, whose duty is to uphold the rule of law, is doing as he should.

Gingrich is playing his part well, as expected, by reducing the over-whelming number of torture cases (remember, we have already seen the photos) down to one and painting it as a seemingly benign case of ‘frustration’ on the part of the interrogator.

He can ignore the effe...
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up
Embed This Clip In Your Site...

New from the makers of Clipmarks:  Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!

OK