 approaching_c says: We must pursue a utilitarian government and substance over symbolism. The primary focus of any act of a governing body should always be the realistic result of that act. When analyzing a proposed policy, do not be swayed by emotional promises of an idealistic nature. Only consider whether it will logically result in a solution to a problem, while simultaneously not causing worse problems in the process. I'd be looking for a government that will look after the many needs of ordinary Americans who have been paying for a war that has put billions into the pockets of mates such as Haliburton (Cheney was their CEO). I'd be looking for a government that was not in the hands of organ grinders. I'm not a fan of the Bush administration and I'm not making an argument to defend them. I'm just pointing out a lapse in logic with the arguments of many politicians currently pursuing the presidency. Your emotional response does not at all touch on the argument I have initiated. You have simply shifted the focus to an area where you feel you can make some sort of point. I'm completely aware of this already hammered upon issue (believe it or not I was already aware that Cheney was the CEO of Halliburton, but thanks for the aside). It is not my aim to begin a partisan political argument for there is enough of that crap out there and in my opinion it is a waste of time. If I were to labe... |
View the Top Clips from September 19, 2007
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
New from the makers of Clipmarks: Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!
|
||||||||||||||
