Clipmarks
   
  
   
deb2012followshare
5-7-2008 11:42 AM292 views
deb2012 says:
3 ideas can make a huge difference
13 Comments   | Add a Comment
5-7-2008 11:55 AM
alanocu
very good - thanks!
5-8-2008 8:37 PM
willhelm
deb2012, I think I have a better idea. In the 1970s Jimmy Carter set up a project for the development of synthetic fuels. The response of OPEC to this was to crash the price of oil to make any such venture unprofitable. So, if the US devises policy to drill for our own oil, liquefy coal (since the US has the largest natural reserves in the world), and even develop alternatives such as ethanol ( preferably from sugar - like in Brazil), the response of OPEC would be to render those alternative unprofitable by slashing the price of oil. What do you think?
5-9-2008 7:55 AM
deb2012
willhelm, I'm not as interested in bringing down the price of oil as I am in seeing this country use less oil in favor of new and less polluting technologies. The upsides are all good-cleaner planet, no more reliance on middle east. So maybe higher oil is the best plan of the three.
5-9-2008 8:06 AM
tabsey
A simple solution is to tie oil prices to profit margins; as profits go down, the price of oil goes up and vica versa of course. The perfect watchdog, shareholders, will have to know what the profits are.
5-9-2008 8:09 AM
skwirlinator
The people that develop the new energy source will control the world. When the breakthru happens our technology will jump by leaps and bounds. Will the age of fossil fuels be viewed as the dark age of technology?
5-9-2008 9:10 AM
BartendingBear
Properly inflate your tires.
5-9-2008 9:47 AM
willhelm
willhelm, I'm not as interested in bringing down the price of oil as I
am in seeing this country use less oil in favor of new and less
polluting technologies.
You do not care that people are suffering? You do not care that oil is now $120-ish a barrel and some estimates are that it could surpass $200 a barrel? You do not care about the catastrophic effects this rise will continue to have on food prices ( via production and transportation) and cause more of the world's poor to starve?
You're only concern is some delusional environmental concern? Do you not care that some companies will have to lay-off people to make up for transportation costs? Do you not care that companies ar...
5-9-2008 10:00 AM
deb2012
I don't understand why you want to translate my comment into things I did not say. Why are people suffering, that is my concern. There are many ways to alleviate suffering. Americans have become addicted to oil. That is why some call it suffering. Addiction is painful, especially when we don't open our eyes to alternatives. We Americans use 25% of the worlds oil, which led to many of the political decisions of governments to get involved in the middle east. I don't believe that is sustainable for us to use the same amount or more oil as the population grows, unless we stop overconsuming, or we decide to destroy the world's emerging economies who will consume more oil if prices are lower...
5-9-2008 10:10 AM
skwirlinator
We are stagnated in the fossil fuel era. We must break free of the limitations of this limited resource. Harnessing a renewable clean energy source is imperative to our childrens future. A new power source will open possibilities to our advancement that we cannot comprehend.
There are dangers in searching for such a power source but I believe the risk is worth the payback.
The worst thing about the price of fuel is the fact that it is increasing faster than our economy can compensate. If wages were increasing as fast or faster than the oil prices there would be no crisis.
Once the prices level off the wages will rise to compensate. When services and production comes to a standstill there w...
5-9-2008 10:28 AM
willhelm
I don't understand why you want to translate my comment into things I did not say.
How did I do that. You said you were not "interested in bringing down the price of oil".

Americans have become addicted to oil.
We are not "addicted" to oil any more than we are addicted to our families, success, communities, productivity, innovation, scientific advancement, society, or liberty. It just so happens oil, like air or water, is vital. If the wolrld is a body, then oil is the blood flowing through that body. That is not a bad thing. YOu can try to make it a bad thing by saying it's use causes environmental damage and there may be som truth to that. We should minimiz...
5-9-2008 11:14 AM
deb2012
I'm not as interested in bringing down the price of oil as I am in seeing this country use less oil
as interested as does not equal uninterested or uncaring about suffering


You asked if I did not care that people are suffering. I care about the suffering of others-I only ask that you not make conclusions based on things I did not say, but you imply.

I never said I am happy that people are suffering. I care but I don't equate it with higher oil, but with addiction to over-using the resource, which entrenches us in a conflict with the middle east. I'd be surprised if you said the current pain in this economy is not related to the middle east. The potential...
5-9-2008 11:21 AM
willhelm
I never said I am happy that people are suffering.
What you accuse me of is no different than what you do here. I never said you were "happy" about people suffering. Anyway, to me it seems that if you place fake environmental concerns over the facts as they are occuring before our eyes regarding human suffering, then I find my question to you a reasonable one. I'm sorry you are so defensive about it. It wasn't an attack on your character, but I can see how you might think so. Sorry.
My instincts are that you do care and my comment was more of an emotional appeal, perhaps a bit fallacious, but still within reasonable questioning.
5-9-2008 11:37 AM
deb2012
I'm learning that this is a tough format for me to communicate! Thanks for your patience. Don't stop challenging me.
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up





Embed This Clip In Your Site...


OK