blueridge says: Contrast the media's "militant Islamists" versus Churchills' "terrorist Jews" in this eye-opening article written by him. Today what Churchill calls "international Jews" includes the neoconservatives and modern militant Zionists's ideology, including the Federal Reserve Banksters, World Zionist Congress, Bilderberg and other secret societies, including from which Freemasonry sprang (Churchill lists Weishaupt founder of Illuminatti), as well as the modern "Israel" he advocated for the cause of "Zionism" back then. The radical "international Jews" he refers to by their behavior and ideology, not their race, and calls them "terrorist Jews". Note he said the "world-wide conspiracy" was real, from which also "democracy" came ("impossible equality"), particularly starting with the bloody French Revolution where it was these kind of Jews that started the philosopy of mass murder of the Christian royalty and churches (albeit corrupt, not truly Christian), and fomented revolutions around British PM Chamberlain called the jews a 'troublesome people' in 1938, and throughout the war Churchill chose not to refer to the plight of the Jews as he did not wish to lessen the people's spirit for the war, the people being historically antisemitic. The shocking history of generalised antisemitism in Europe over the last millennium is well documented (though rarely headlined) and until relatively recently it was considered acceptable for heroes of the West such as Churchill to publically pronounce in such a way. Martin Gilbert's 'The Holocaust' and Norman Cantor's 'The Sacred Chain' provide useful introductions to the overall picture. In British literature: In the 1800s, Dickens, for all his social awareness, was less than kind to Jews; always making the point that Fagin was a Jew exploiting urchins and supporting criminals. He was a fence (a receiver of stolen goods) - the worst sort of criminal - without fences there would be no criminals...ergo fences ergo Fagin ergo Jews are bad. lol Agatha Christie referred to people 'of the Hebrew persuasion' or 'someone obviously of the criminal classes'. Chariots of Fire includes other examples of institutionalised antisemitism. I came across it in the 50s at school. All Jews fled Europe because they were rich and could afford to. Never mind that m... Who benefits most from a "Clash of Civilizations" between Islam and Christianity? Those who desire the eradication of both. See the related important clipmark on Jews Against Zionism and Israel. This is very important since this is frequently the issue behind the middle east "war on terrorism", and the neoconservatives are behind the war policy. That was a good clip, blueridge. I just think we have to be careful with distinguishing between Jews and Zionists. There are many Christian Zionists. My own small involvement with debate about Israel has included friendships with Palestinians and Jews, and as your clip mentioned above demonstrates it is most unfortunate that by and large the mainstream media do not reflect the numerically significant number of Jews all over the world, including israel, who have opposition to some Zionist and some Israeli policies. Unfortunately, too, this factor which allows for a simplistic and polarised concept of Jewish identity can enable a useful vehicle for antisemitism. Which obviously is not to say t... May I stir the pot? The link takes you to a Google video asserting that Israeli intellegence activies in the US were not only extensive (penetrating dozens of US agencies) but linked to 9/11, and features a FOXNews report on the subject. In retrospect it doesn't seem preposterous. I would like to know more about the assertions made in the linked film clip of US/Israeli dual-citizenship for individuals such as Ari Fliescher, Michael Chertoff, Jack Abramoff, Mark Grossman, Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, Scooter Libby, William Kristol, and more. I've tried to run down corroboration on the 'net for a couple of them bu... and features a FOXNews reportHere's the full report: Fox 4 Part Special on Israeli Spying in and on US I harbor no ill will against Jews in general, only against the destructive and greedy ones who might have a purpose beyond that of good will toward all men.You've made a pretty good job of contradicting that statement in the rest of your comment. Conspiracy theorists always need a scapegoat and the Jews are handy, they're used to it. My niece is a US citizen with dual nationality. She is neither Israeli nor Jewish. Is she a suspect I wonder. Excellent comments and links by BartendingBear and Thisnamecantbetaken. It is impossible to refute that a particular revolutionary cabal has historically and is now controlling the march of government in a consistent quest of regime change (including WWI and WWII) for the purpose of "global hegemony", of which 9/11 was a "catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor". Those quoted words are directly from the neoconservatives themselves, who are disciples of Trotsky whom Churchill lists. No one benefited more than the neoconservative's agenda and Israel from 9/11. Conspiracies are merely a fact in history, more common than not, of which Churchill himself in this clip traces a pattern for the ... You've made a pretty good job of contradicting that statement in the rest of your comment.Why is that Mick? Do not fall prey to the idea that because one criticizes a Jew that it automatically makes one an anti-semite. That is a cloak under which many evil-doers might hide, and as much a disservice to the memory of those innocent Jewish victims of the Holocaust as forgetting them would be, IMHO. Conspiracy theorists always need a scapegoat and the Jews are handy, they're used to it.A scapegoat or a true villian with his hand on the switch? When a spade is a spade, it is a spade. Not all Jews are pious, not all are holy, and not all are innocent simply because... Did you watch any of the videos, mickfinn? For me at least, they raise some troubling questions about the true origins of 9/11, the true motives for the "War on Terror", the true purpose of "Homeland Security" etc. There are still too many unanswered questions, even though sometimes it seems the rabbit hole may be much deeper than anyone ever imagined. I for one, don't buy the official version of events on 9/11... or the reasons given for the wars, or torture or surveillance or... in fact I don't believe much that comes out of the mouths of those, who have been caught in lie, after lie, after lie. Do you? I'm grateful people like Blueridge, BartendingBear etc are helping pull away the curt... Great clip link by Thisname...popped! |
View the Top Clips from January 3, 2008
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
||
|
|
|||