The Bible never once mentions democracy, a republic or anything related to American values

Rather than democracy, the Bible's preferred model of government is a divine-right kingship, where one individual is hereditarily chosen and wields supreme power. This is what America's founders were rebelling against when they brought forth this nation.

The Bible never once mentions freedom of speech or freedom of religion … separation of powers

Freedom of speech, assembly, press and petition: The Bible does not grant freedom of speech, but rather threatens death for those who speak in unapproved ways. Ancient Israel had no concept of the press, but there are also many ca...

The Bible never once mentions democracy, a republic or anything related to American values

Rather than democracy, the Bible's preferred model of government is a divine-right kingship, where one individual is hereditarily chosen and wields supreme power. This is what America's founders were rebelling against when they brought forth this nation.

The Bible never once mentions freedom of speech or freedom of religion … separation of powers

Freedom of speech, assembly, press and petition: The Bible does not grant freedom of speech, but rather threatens death for those who speak in unapproved ways. Ancient Israel had no concept of the press, but there are also many cases in which people were killed for unapproved assemblies or for questioning their leaders (Numbers 16:35).
Religious freedom: Far from granting people the right to worship as they see fit, the Bible says that anyone who encourages believers to serve other gods, or anyone who speaks "blasphemy", should be killed (Deuteronomy 13:6-9, Leviticus 24:16). God himself joins in on many occasions by slaughtering people who worship different gods (Exodus 22:20). Although Jesus does say that people should "render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's" (Mark 12:17), there is no indication that any non-Christian should enjoy the same freedom of worship as believers.
Separation of powers: In the Bible's divine-right monarchy, a single individual wields supreme power over all functions of government. Some apologists seek to find an equivalent in a verse from Isaiah 33 - "For the Lord is our judge, the Lord is our lawgiver, the Lord is our king" - but what they overlook is that this verse explicitly envisions all three of these powers as being held by the same person.

This is correct contrary to the naive neo-Christian churches which have abandoned historic Christian teaching. The Constitution was written by half dozen men, all either Deists or Freemasons who wanted to remove religious influence in government affairs (except their own). This is why you see Deistic ecumenical superstitious holidays like "Christmas" (winter solstice) being "established" on December 25th as a Federal holiday. The early colonial Christians, like the Pilgrims, considered it a pagan and popish ritual that no Christian should observe. Deists and Freemasons actually have a Supreme Being ("one nation, under God") which is a form of religion, akin to the Kaballah, and contrary ...

This is correct contrary to the naive neo-Christian churches which have abandoned historic Christian teaching. The Constitution was written by half dozen men, all either Deists or Freemasons who wanted to remove religious influence in government affairs (except their own). This is why you see Deistic ecumenical superstitious holidays like "Christmas" (winter solstice) being "established" on December 25th as a Federal holiday. The early colonial Christians, like the Pilgrims, considered it a pagan and popish ritual that no Christian should observe. Deists and Freemasons actually have a Supreme Being ("one nation, under God") which is a form of religion, akin to the Kaballah, and contrary to Christianity, and historically tied to Baal worship under his various forms, from Egypt to Rome.

If the government should not establish religion (1st amendment) then it should not establish the pagan anti-Christian holiday called "Christmass".

This is correct contrary to the naive neo-Christian churches which have abandoned historic Christian teaching. The Constitution was written by half dozen men, all either Deists or Freemasons who wanted to remove religious influence (except their own) in government affairs. This is why you see Deistic ecumenical superstitious holidays like "Christmas" (winter solstice) being "established" on December 25th as a Federal holiday. The early colonial Christians, like the Pilgrims, considered it a pagan and popish ritual that no Christian should observe. Deists and Freemasons actually have a Supreme Being ("one nation, under God") which is a form of religion, akin to the Kaballah, and contrary ...

This is correct contrary to the naive neo-Christian churches which have abandoned historic Christian teaching. The Constitution was written by half dozen men, all either Deists or Freemasons who wanted to remove religious influence (except their own) in government affairs. This is why you see Deistic ecumenical superstitious holidays like "Christmas" (winter solstice) being "established" on December 25th as a Federal holiday. The early colonial Christians, like the Pilgrims, considered it a pagan and popish ritual that no Christian should observe. Deists and Freemasons actually have a Supreme Being ("one nation, under God") which is a form of religion, akin to the Kaballah, and contrary to Christianity, and historically tied to Baal worship under his various forms, from Egypt to Rome.

If the government should not establish religion (1st amendment) then it should not establish the pagan anti-Christian holiday called "Christmass".