 Antara says: ....... There are at least two other possible ways to interpret the video. “Journalists” are the most powerful people in the world. No wonder that each Fox News prime time show beats Olbermann. Who wants to hear him talk about throwing garbage cans through the windows at Starbucks after finishing off a grande mocha frappicino? He's a turd. The dishonesty in this blog post is staggering. First, the claim to absolute certainty that the video of Mohammad al-Dura's shooting was faked. Second, the claim that Olbermann and his guest were aware of accusations the video was faked, and were convinced by them. Third, the claim that Olbermann and his guest were deliberately implying that the video of Neda Soltan's death was faked as well, and ignoring the fact they were making comparisons about the resonance and effects of these images. Olbermann is scum, but I am sure he appreciates your support. The issue is not whether or not I support Olbermann; the issue is there any proof that Olbermann was advocating that the video of Neda Soltan was faked? I see no proof of that in this blog post. Now if you read my clip title.....there is a ? at the end.... perhaps you will conclude the answer to that ? is no. The blog outlines varied views of the conversation....you are free to choose yours. Perhaps I (and others) will arrive at a different conclusion. On Monday’s Countdown show on MSNBC, as host Keith Olbermann and NBC Total B.S. That is not what he said. In fact he said the opposite that the Iranians are coming up with preposterous excuses for Needa's murder. But then reality has a well known liberal bias. And that question mark at the end. Yeah I seen Faux News use that before. Wink, wink, nod, nod. "We are not SAYING that, but you know, there is a possibility that may be, that's what he is implying." Total Bull. What are you whining about ....he didn't say what? He DID say exactly what we have him in print saying. He did not say that it was fake, only discussing the impact of the images. So no, this is not a suggestion of whether it was fake and it was Engels who brought it up not Olbermann. In fact Olbermann speaks of other important situations like what happened in Tienanmen Square. But you go ahead and stretch that to it's illogical limits. Again, we have their actual conversation in print. You can cry all you want, doesn't change a thing. I saw the clip. So what the heck you talking about. Or did you clip a video you didn't see? You come on this clip and try to claim the conversation (that is now in both print and video) did not happen. It is right before your eyes. Draw your own conclusions and have a nice life. Talking to you about most anything really usually ends up being a complete waste of time, which is why I usually don't bother, lol always does with liberals. They feel they have the right to make up their own reality - and are you going to believe the voices in your head or your lying eyes? Yeah, just as I suspected.....all the loonies have started posting their "Neda's murder was fake/she was killed by CIA/aliens/ conspiracy theories coupled with their 9-11 troother shite"..... Barf. There are a lot of truly mentally ill people on here and I am beginning to understand why many people have stopped posting altogether. |
View the Top Clips from June 26, 2009
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
||
|
|
|||
|
New from the makers of Clipmarks: Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!
|
|||
