This resolution was first introduced by Rangel in January of '03. It was not meant to pass or even to go to the floor for a vote. Instead, it was a way to open a dialogue regarding the fact that our wars are disproportionately fought by our nation's poor and as a bit of political theater whose point was that the neocons and war supporters would be less likely to support a conflict if THEIR sons and daughters might die in its prosecution.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/01/07/rangel.draft/

Prior to the '04 Presidential election, the GOP brought Rangel's resolution to the floor for a vote as a way to dispel rumors that a draft was imminent. It failed 402-2 with even Rangel voting again...

This resolution was first introduced by Rangel in January of '03. It was not meant to pass or even to go to the floor for a vote. Instead, it was a way to open a dialogue regarding the fact that our wars are disproportionately fought by our nation's poor and as a bit of political theater whose point was that the neocons and war supporters would be less likely to support a conflict if THEIR sons and daughters might die in its prosecution.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/01/07/rangel.draft/

Prior to the '04 Presidential election, the GOP brought Rangel's resolution to the floor for a vote as a way to dispel rumors that a draft was imminent. It failed 402-2 with even Rangel voting against it.
http://washtimes.com/national/20041006-012158-2811r.htm/

The reintroduced version you cite here is almost nine months old and will never be voted on.